Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task #39426

Closed
3 of 6 tasks
lanitochka17 opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 17 comments
Closed
3 of 6 tasks

Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task #39426

lanitochka17 opened this issue Apr 2, 2024 · 17 comments
Assignees
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Apr 2, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.59-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/4468742
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+jp_e_category@applause.expensifail.com
Issue reported by: Applause - Internal Team

Action Performed:

  1. Go to https://staging.new.expensify.com/
  2. Log in
  3. Go to any chat
  4. Create a task and assign it to a user with a custom name

Expected Result:

Assignee custom name is visible in the task

Actual Result:

Assignee custom name is not visible in the task

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6435740_1712073273274.Name.1.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~018a6cf192e2c42cc8
  • Upwork Job ID: 1775237848166469632
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-04-02
@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @luacmartins (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 2, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Author

@luacmartins FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors

@lanitochka17
Copy link
Author

We think that this bug might be related to #vip-vsp

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Taking a look now

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

I believe this is caused by #38957

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

I'm gonna demote this as a blocker since it doesn't really affect the functionality that much and let the original contributor work on a fix.

@luacmartins luacmartins added Daily KSv2 and removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels Apr 2, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedGaber93 could you please work on a fix for this regression since it comes from your PR? cc @sobitneupane @puneetlath

@luacmartins luacmartins added the External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~018a6cf192e2c42cc8

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task [$500] Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task Apr 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Apr 2, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @allroundexperts (External)

@luacmartins luacmartins changed the title [$500] Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task Task – Assignee custom name is not visible in the task Apr 2, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Apr 2, 2024
@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Reassigning to @sobitneupane since they reviewed the offending PR.

@ahmedGaber93
Copy link
Contributor

@ahmedGaber93 could you please work on a fix for this regression since it comes from your PR?

I will take a look, but about the expected behavior, we decide based on here #38079 (comment) and here #38079 (comment) to prioritize login over display name for all the mentions in the app including task preview.
@luacmartins

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Hmm so is this the new expected behavior @puneetlath ?

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this is expected. We decided to make mentions consistent and always look the same, including in task previews. We should update whatever testrail test is currently testing this for that. I'll post in #qa.

@luacmartins
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for confirming. Seems like we can just close this issue then!

@isagoico
Copy link

isagoico commented Apr 3, 2024

TC has been updated to reflect this new behavior🎉

image

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

Great, thanks @isagoico!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Daily KSv2 Engineering External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants