Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expense - Share code option is missing in expense report and transaction thread #41799

Closed
6 tasks done
m-natarajan opened this issue May 7, 2024 · 10 comments
Closed
6 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering

Comments

@m-natarajan
Copy link

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 1.4.71-0
Reproducible in staging?: y
Reproducible in production?: no
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: n/a
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: Applause internal team
Slack conversation:

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to FAB > Submit expense.
  3. Submit expense to user with no unsettled expense.
  4. Click on the expense preview.
  5. Click on the header in combined report.
  6. Note that Share code option is missing.
  7. Submit another expense.
  8. Click on the header in expense report.
  9. Note that Share code option is also missing.

Expected Result:

Share code option will be present in expense report and transaction thread.

Actual Result:

Share code option is missing in expense report and transaction thread.

Workaround:

unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6474095_1715105303215.bandicam_2024-05-08_02-05-40-138.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@m-natarajan m-natarajan added DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API labels May 7, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @yuwenmemon (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @abekkala (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented May 7, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open Staging deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly on the following:

  1. If you find which PR caused the issue/bug, you can reassign it to the person responsible for it.
    • If the author is OOO or won’t get online before the daily deploy is due, you are responsible for finding the best fix/path forward. Don’t hesitate to ask for help!
  2. Try to reproduce the issue, if the bug is on production, remove the DeployBlocker label but stay assigned to fix it (or find out which PR broke it to get help from the author).
    • You can adjust the urgency of the issue to better represent the gravity of the bug.
    • If the issue is super low priority, feel free to un-assign yourself.
    • Be careful with PHP warnings, sometimes it is more complex than just adding a null coalescing operator as they might be uncovering some bigger bug.
    • If it was a one-off issue that requires no action (for example, Bedrock was down or it is a duplicated issue), you can close it.

Remember rule #2: Never un-assign yourself from a real DeployBlocker unless you are 100% sure someone else is assigned and will take care of it.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Hourly KSv2 label May 7, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added Hourly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels May 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 7, 2024

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@m-natarajan
Copy link
Author

@abekkala FYI I haven't added the External label as I wasn't 100% sure about this issue. Please take a look and add the label if you agree it's a bug and can be handled by external contributors

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Seems related to #40979 cc @DylanDylann @ZhenjaHorbach

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

@ZhenjaHorbach please comment here so I can assign you

@ZhenjaHorbach
Copy link
Contributor

ZhenjaHorbach commented May 7, 2024

@ZhenjaHorbach please comment here so I can assign you

Hello )
I will fix it
But if you don't mind
I'll do it tomorrow morning

Plus a bit unclear
Should we show Pin with the same condition as Share ?

Снимок экрана 2024-05-07 в 23 12 17

@yuwenmemon yuwenmemon removed the DeployBlocker Indicates it should block deploying the API label May 7, 2024
@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, sorry we can't really wait I will have to revert the PR.

@marcaaron
Copy link
Contributor

This is fixed now. Gonna check it off.

@marcaaron marcaaron removed DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment Hourly KSv2 labels May 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Engineering
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants