Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[$250] [HOLD for payment 2024-08-05] Improve filtering performance in task assignee list #46150

Closed
roryabraham opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 14 comments
Assignees
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor

Comments

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor

roryabraham commented Jul 24, 2024

This issue is branched off of #37619 and was created specifically to manage the lifecycle and payments of this PR: #40338

Issue OwnerCurrent Issue Owner: @
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0141f3da35d3e190a5
  • Upwork Job ID: 1820580872082146605
  • Last Price Increase: 2024-08-05
@roryabraham roryabraham added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor Daily KSv2 Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. labels Jul 24, 2024
@roryabraham roryabraham self-assigned this Jul 24, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Jul 24, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @brunovjk (External)

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 24, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @alexpensify (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

@roryabraham
Copy link
Contributor Author

@TMisiukiewicz please comment for assignment and link #40338 to this issue before opening it up for review. Thanks

@TMisiukiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @roryabraham, linked the issue and opened the PR

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2 and removed Daily KSv2 labels Jul 25, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added Weekly KSv2 Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production and removed Weekly KSv2 labels Jul 29, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title Improve filtering performance in task assignee list [HOLD for payment 2024-08-05] Improve filtering performance in task assignee list Jul 29, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Reviewing Has a PR in review label Jul 29, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Reviewing label has been removed, please complete the "BugZero Checklist".

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 9.0.13-4 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue:

If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-08-05. 🎊

For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 29, 2024

BugZero Checklist: The PR fixing this issue has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:

  • [@brunovjk] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR:
  • [@brunovjk] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment:
  • [@brunovjk] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion:
  • [@brunovjk] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug.
  • [@brunovjk] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.
  • [@alexpensify] Link the GH issue for creating/updating the regression test once above steps have been agreed upon:

@brunovjk
Copy link
Contributor

brunovjk commented Aug 5, 2024

  • [@brunovjk] The PR that introduced the bug has been identified. Link to the PR: N/A
  • [@brunovjk] The offending PR has been commented on, pointing out the bug it caused and why, so the author and reviewers can learn from the mistake. Link to comment: N/A
  • [@brunovjk] A discussion in #expensify-bugs has been started about whether any other steps should be taken (e.g. updating the PR review checklist) in order to catch this type of bug sooner. Link to discussion: N/A
  • [@brunovjk] Determine if we should create a regression test for this bug. Yes
  • [@brunovjk] If we decide to create a regression test for the bug, please propose the regression test steps to ensure the same bug will not reach production again.

Regression Test Proposal:

  1. Open global create and select "Assign task"
  2. Name the task
  3. Press "Assignee"
  4. Type a value that matches some of the options from the list
  5. Verify a list loaded and it has the same order and content filtered appropriately
  6. Clear input and type non-existing e-mail
  7. Verify non-existing email appears if it's valid
  8. Clear input and type one of the restricted emails e.g. admin@expensify.com
  9. Verify "No results found" appears

Do we agree 👍 or 👎

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the Weekly KSv2 label Aug 5, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Daily KSv2 label Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Payment Summary

Upwork Job

BugZero Checklist (@alexpensify)

  • I have verified the correct assignees and roles are listed above and updated the neccesary manual offers
  • I have verified that there are no duplicate or incorrect contracts on Upwork for this job (https://www.upwork.com/ab/applicants//hired)
  • I have paid out the Upwork contracts or cancelled the ones that are incorrect
  • I have verified the payment summary above is correct

@alexpensify alexpensify added External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor and removed External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor labels Aug 5, 2024
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot changed the title [HOLD for payment 2024-08-05] Improve filtering performance in task assignee list [$250] [HOLD for payment 2024-08-05] Improve filtering performance in task assignee list Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0141f3da35d3e190a5

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Aug 5, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 5, 2024

Current assignee @brunovjk is eligible for the External assigner, not assigning anyone new.

@alexpensify alexpensify removed the Help Wanted Apply this label when an issue is open to proposals by contributors label Aug 5, 2024
@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@brunovjk - I sent an offer in Upwork. Please accept and I can complete the required process:

#46150 (comment)

Thanks!

@brunovjk
Copy link
Contributor

brunovjk commented Aug 6, 2024

Done! Thank you @alexpensify :D

@alexpensify
Copy link
Contributor

Closing - I completed the payment process in Upwork. I'll revisit this GH for the regression test process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Awaiting Payment Auto-added when associated PR is deployed to production Bug Something is broken. Auto assigns a BugZero manager. Daily KSv2 External Added to denote the issue can be worked on by a contributor
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants