Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expense - Incorrect avatar for pay preview and missing avatar & username after submitting expense #49889

Open
6 tasks done
lanitochka17 opened this issue Sep 28, 2024 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
Engineering Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2

Comments

@lanitochka17
Copy link

lanitochka17 commented Sep 28, 2024

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Version Number: 9.0.41-2
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: N
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: N/A
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): applausetester+kh010901@applause.expensifail.com

Action Performed:

  1. Go to staging.new.expensify.com
  2. Go to DM
  3. Click + > Pay someone
  4. Enter amount > Pay the user
  5. Click + > Submit expense
  6. Submit expense to the user

Expected Result:

In Step 4, the report preview avatar for "paying preview" should display the sender avatar because the sender pays the money
In Step 6, when submitting expense after paying the user, the expense preview will have the sender avatar and sender name

Actual Result:

In Step 4, the report preview avatar for "paying preview" displays the receiver avatar instead of sender avatar
In Step 6, when submitting expense after paying the user, the expense preview is missing sender avatar and sender name briefly, then it appears

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Add any screenshot/video evidence

Bug6617940_1727476416029.20240928_062511.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

@lanitochka17 lanitochka17 added the DeployBlockerCash This issue or pull request should block deployment label Sep 28, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Triggered auto assignment to @MonilBhavsar (DeployBlockerCash), see https://stackoverflowteams.com/c/expensify/questions/9980/ for more details.

Copy link
Contributor

👋 Friendly reminder that deploy blockers are time-sensitive ⏱ issues! Check out the open `StagingDeployCash` deploy checklist to see the list of PRs included in this release, then work quickly to do one of the following:

  1. Identify the pull request that introduced this issue and revert it.
  2. Find someone who can quickly fix the issue.
  3. Fix the issue yourself.

@MonilBhavsar
Copy link
Contributor

@grgia @eh2077 this seems to be coming from #49172

For pay requests, childOwnerAccountID is the payee and not the payer. Also, the report action is always ReportPreview.

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Sep 30, 2024

Looking now

@grgia grgia self-assigned this Sep 30, 2024
@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Sep 30, 2024

This seems to be a BE problem.

Why are pay requests setting the childOwnerAccountID to the payee?

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2024

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

@jasperhuangg
Copy link
Contributor

We reverted the problematic PR #49945. Gonna remove the label but keep this open so @grgia can fix this in a followup.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Sep 30, 2024

⚠️ Looks like this issue was linked to a Deploy Blocker here

If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results.

If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here.

If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Engineering Reviewing Has a PR in review Weekly KSv2
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants