Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Expensify-Chat-Playbook-for-Conferences #22369

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 10, 2023

Conversation

MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

@MitchExpensify MitchExpensify commented Jul 6, 2023

Details

Add the new article Expensify Playbook for Conferences

Fixed Issues

PROPOSAL: https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/290084

Tests

  1. Run the help site, navigate to the Playbooks hub, and click on Expensify Chat Playbook for Conferences
  2. Verify the content of the article is shown.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

NA

For example:

  1. Click on the text input to bring it into focus
  2. Upload an image via copy paste
  3. Verify a modal appears displaying a preview of that image
    --->
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screen.Recording.2023-02-21.at.16.47.31.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Mobile Web - Safari
Desktop
iOS
Android

@MitchExpensify MitchExpensify requested a review from a team as a code owner July 6, 2023 19:17
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Santhosh-Sellavel and removed request for a team July 6, 2023 19:17
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 6, 2023

@Santhosh-Sellavel Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 6, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @Santhosh-Sellavel ! The preview function wasn't helping me here so I'm curious if these changes look aligned with other playbooks e.g. here https://help.expensify.com/articles/playbooks/Expensify-Playbook-for-Small-to-Medium-Sized-Businesses

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Let me check

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 6, 2023

@MitchExpensify Looks good so far, check the comparison below

Screen.Recording.2023-07-07.at.1.01.40.AM.mov

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @Santhosh-Sellavel ! Thats weird that most of the content seems to be missing

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

MitchExpensify commented Jul 6, 2023

image

Do we need to remove "< !--" and "- ->" from each section so the content shows?

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Basically there is copy under each header that doesn't appear to be showing. Here's some of the draft for reference

image

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 6, 2023

@MitchExpensify

Do we need to remove "< !--" and "- ->" from each section so the content shows?

That's the syntax for commenting in markdown, those comments are not visible in the preview!

Here is this is how it looks now, after removing it

Screen.Recording.2023-07-07.at.4.00.27.AM.mov

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nice! Ok that looks great

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Here is the file content.md

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good to me @Santhosh-Sellavel !

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Please make the changes, seems it's not done yet!

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think I made the necessary changes @Santhosh-Sellavel

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

What are the next steps here @Santhosh-Sellavel ?

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@MitchExpensify
The next step update the PR description i.e. complete the checklist and add test steps. Here is an example PR

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Or

CLA Assistant Lite bot: Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open-source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution. You can sign the CLA by just posting a Pull Request Comment same as the below format.

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

You can retrigger this bot by commenting recheck in this Pull Request

@MitchExpensify You didn't sign this please do that!

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

The next step update the PR description i.e. complete the checklist and add test steps

Done! Thanks

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 7, 2023

@MitchExpensify You can delete this unnecessary text

Screenshot 2023-07-07 at 11 53 18 PM

Also Add [No QA] to title

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Screen.Recording.2023-07-07.at.4.00.27.AM.mov

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@MitchExpensify

Need to update the routes.yml as the PR does. Then we should be good to go!

Screenshot 2023-07-08 at 12 00 46 AM

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Seems like we may not need to update, as I don't see any existing article references also. So let's get an engineer to move this forward

Copy link
Collaborator

@Santhosh-Sellavel Santhosh-Sellavel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from chiragsalian July 7, 2023 18:38
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 7, 2023

@chiragsalian Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

https://help.expensify.com/hubs/playbooks

Do we need to do anything additional to get this playbook to appear just like the others in terms of being listed here and here?

image

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

No, we don't need to do anything

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

@MitchExpensify You have to save it with externsion .md

Expensify-Chat-Playbook-for-Conferences.md

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 7, 2023

That is the problem why your preview was not working on git

Screenshot 2023-07-08 at 2 20 20 AM

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Here is the recording @MitchExpensify, that confirms this works

Screen.Recording.2023-07-08.at.2.23.40.AM.mov

@chiragsalian
Copy link
Contributor

yup what santhosh said. Also looks like you've got travis errors to address. Let me know if you need any help with it.

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ok that looks great!

@chiragsalian yes if you could help me address the Travis errors that'd be great! Thank you

@MitchExpensify MitchExpensify merged commit 0bdca70 into main Jul 10, 2023
@MitchExpensify MitchExpensify deleted the MitchExpensify-patch-1 branch July 10, 2023 18:55
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/MitchExpensify in version: 1.3.39-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/francoisl in version: 1.3.39-11 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

MitchExpensify commented Jul 13, 2023

This hit prod but I don't see it on https://help.expensify.com/hubs/playbooks

image

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

@francoisl @Santhosh-Sellavel Any idea why this isn't showing on production?

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will issue payment to @Santhosh-Sellavel via NewDot - $500 seems fair to us both 👍

@Santhosh-Sellavel
Copy link
Collaborator

Santhosh-Sellavel commented Jul 13, 2023

Seems Deployment failed for help docs https://github.com/Expensify/App/actions/workflows/deployExpensifyHelp.yml

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool, what do we need to do to get this live?

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

I haven't had time to look into this today yet, I set myself a reminder to check after the next deploy.

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you! We are keen to get this over to CallStack asap because its part of the plan to have them use Expensify Chat for React Europe 🙇

@francoisl
Copy link
Contributor

Done - see https://help.expensify.com/articles/playbooks/Expensify-Chat-Playbook-for-Conferences

I had to cancel this old workflow that was stuck running for 15 days, and then I manually restarted the deployExpensifyHelp.yml workflow.

@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awesome!, thanks @francoisl

### Step 3: Add chat room QR codes to the applicable session slide deck

Gather QR codes:
1. Go to new.exensify.com
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one says exensify - opened a quick PR here. Directly assigned you @chiragsalian since you already have context.

@anmurali
Copy link

Approved $500 to Santhosh on ND

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants