Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix infinite loading in Flag page in offline #23775

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 8, 2023

Conversation

dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 commented Jul 28, 2023

Details

In offline mode, sometimes the flag page shows loading infinitely. We need to change the condition show loading to fix it

Fixed Issues

$ #23125
PROPOSAL: #23125 (comment)

Tests

  1. Login with user A
  2. On another device, login with user B
  3. From user B, send a message to user A
  4. From user A, go offline
  5. Go to any other report
  6. Go back to the report
  7. Tap the message and select "Flag as offensive"
  8. Verify that the flag page appears instead of loading infinitely
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as above

QA Steps

  1. Login with user A
  2. On another device, login with user B
  3. From user B, send a message to user A
  4. From user A, go offline
  5. Go to any other report
  6. Go back to the report
  7. Tap the message and select "Flag as offensive"
  8. Verify that the flag page appears instead of loading infinitely
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
Screencast.from.28-07-2023.10.41.29.webm
Mobile Web - Chrome
Record_2023-07-28-10-44-04.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
safari_cp.mp4
Desktop
desktop.2.mp4
iOS
ios.mov
Android
android.mp4

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 marked this pull request as ready for review August 1, 2023 02:10
@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 1, 2023 02:10
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and removed request for a team August 1, 2023 02:10
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Aug 1, 2023

@fedirjh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

dukenv0307 commented Aug 1, 2023

@fedirjh In this issue #23568 (comment) we decided to create new HOC for the page need both report and reportAction data. So we can hold this PR until the PR in #23568 is complete to re-use the HOC here.

Comment on lines 160 to 164
const isLoadingInitialReport = props.isLoadingReportData && _.isEmpty(props.report);
const isLoadingInitialReportActions = _.isEmpty(props.reportActions) || (props.report.isLoadingReportActions && _.isEmpty(getActionToFlag()));
const isExistReport = isLoadingInitialReport || (!_.isEmpty(props.report) && !!props.report.reportID);

const shouldShowLoading = (isLoadingInitialReport || isLoadingInitialReportActions) && isExistReport;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dukenv0307 Can you explain the changes? why we didn’t just update the line to

const shouldShowLoading = (props.isLoadingReportData && isEmpty(props.report) || (isEmpty(props.reportActions) && props.report.isLoadingReportActions) 

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fedirjh

  1. when openApp API is complete props.report.isLoadingReportAction for now is undefined because openReport isn't called.
  2. _.isEmpty(props.reportActions) to wait oenReport API is called. But sometimes, props.reportActions is not empty by another api that is readOldestAction and props.reportActions doesn't contain reportAction with reportActionID param. That is the reason we should check reportAction like isLoadingInitialReportActions
  3. if report doesn't exist we don't need to check any thing else that is isExistReport
  4. Because split bill page also has both reportID and reportActionID in param, so we decided to create a new HOC to use for two pages and we can use this in the further. We can see the implement for HOC in this PR Fix crash app when opening split bill detail page by deep link #23977

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since we will implement HOC in the other PR, let's hold this PR, then use the same HOC in this component.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 Aug 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to change the title of this PR?

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh Aug 2, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so, I will leave a note inside the linked issue.

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 changed the title Fix infinite loading in Flag page in offline [Hold #23977]Fix infinite loading in Flag page in offline Aug 2, 2023
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

dukenv0307 commented Aug 3, 2023

@fedirjh #23977 is merged. Can we continue with this PR or wait #23977 is deployed to production?

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Aug 4, 2023

cc @dukenv0307, Let's continue with this PR, we shouldn’t merge it until #23977 is deployed to production.

@dukenv0307 dukenv0307 changed the title [Hold #23977]Fix infinite loading in Flag page in offline Fix infinite loading in Flag page in offline Aug 4, 2023
@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh Updated the PR with the new HOC.

@dukenv0307
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fedirjh Bump

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Aug 7, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.13.17.31.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.16.07.01.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.15.38.50.mp4
Desktop
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.15.28.35.mp4
iOS
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.15.36.07.mp4
Android
CleanShot.2023-08-07.at.16.23.45.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from srikarparsi August 7, 2023 16:33
Copy link
Contributor

@srikarparsi srikarparsi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm as well!

@srikarparsi srikarparsi merged commit 012d604 into Expensify:main Aug 8, 2023
12 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 8, 2023

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 1.3.52-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 9, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/srikarparsi in version: 1.3.52-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.3.52-5 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants