-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable avatar preview for workspace & thread replies #24425
Merged
PauloGasparSv
merged 7 commits into
Expensify:main
from
spcheema:fix/21073-show-avatar-preview
Aug 15, 2023
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2c45580
Enable avatar preview for workspace & thread replies
spcheema 9d4d792
Update props docs
spcheema ffcf575
Avoid duplicate func call
spcheema 0a98249
Refactor & cleanup
spcheema 0282519
Update src/components/RoomHeaderAvatars.js
spcheema 301ad35
Replace static string with const
spcheema 8ff1d2f
Fix avatar hover issue in the case of multiple avatars
spcheema File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -133,6 +133,10 @@ export default { | |
marginLeft: 16, | ||
}, | ||
|
||
mln4: { | ||
marginLeft: -16, | ||
}, | ||
|
||
ml5: { | ||
marginLeft: 20, | ||
}, | ||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@spcheema @aimane-chnaif
I have a query regarding the
isAuthTokenRequired
flag set to true for theAttachmentModal
component. This flag's setting becomes particularly interesting when compared with theAvatar
component's behavior. BothAttachmentModal
andAvatar
utilize the same image source (props.icons[0].source
), yetAvatar
manages to load its image without requiring authentication.This leads me to wonder if there are specific scenarios where authentication is indeed necessary for loading an avatar image. Understanding this is crucial because if authentication is not required in these cases, we might be exposing our authentication tokens to external addresses unnecessarily.
Furthermore, it’s important to consider future updates, particularly regarding the Image component's adaptation to use header-based authentication. Such changes can introduce complexities due to browser security features like CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing). Since avatar sources are not hosted on the same origin, this could potentially lead to CORS errors, disrupting the user experience.
Could you provide insights on the necessity of the
isAuthTokenRequired
flag in this context? Understanding the rationale behind this decision will help us ensure both secure and efficient handling of image sources across different components.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm also interested - AFAIK the auth tokens were only needed for chat attachments, since these obviously need to be private (only accessible by the participants of a report where the chat attachment was sent). I don't know of / remember a reason we would need any avatars to be private & require auth tokens to fetch