Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Composer not focused on click while editor's emoji modal is open #28238

Merged
merged 35 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

tienifr
Copy link
Contributor

@tienifr tienifr commented Sep 26, 2023

Details

Composer is not focused on click while editor's emoji modal is still open. This PR fixes that.

Fixed Issues

$ #25892
PROPOSAL: #25892 (comment)

Tests

Web & Desktop

  1. Go to any chat
  2. Switch a message to edit mode (A)
  3. Click Emoji button of A, leave the modal open
  4. Click main composer
  5. Verify that main composer is focused
    =====
  6. Click A composer
  7. Right click LHN item >> Mark as unread
  8. Verify that A is focused
  9. Right click another message >> Copy to clipboard
  10. Verify that A is focused
    =====
  11. Switch another message to edit mode (B)
  12. Click Emoji button of A >> Close the modal
  13. Verify that A is focused
  14. Repeat step 12-13 with B
    =====
  15. Click then Close B composer
  16. Verify that main composer is focused
    =====
  17. Click A composer
  18. Delete A from another device/browser
  19. Right click another message >> Copy to clipboard
  20. Verify that main composer is focused

mWeb & Android & iOS

  1. Go to any chat
  2. Switch a message to edit mode (A)
  3. Verify main composer hides
  4. Click Emoji button of A >> Close the modal
  5. Verify that A is focused
    =====
  6. Right click a message >> Copy to clipboard
  7. Verify that A is focused
    =====
  8. Switch another message to edit mode (B)
  9. Click Emoji button of A >> Close the modal
  10. mWeb & Android: Verify that A is focused
  11. mWeb & Android: Repeat step 9-10 with B
  12. iOS: Verify that B is focused
    =====
  13. Press then Close B composer
  14. Verify main composer appears
    =====
  15. Click A composer
  16. Delete A from another device/browser
  17. Verify that main composer appears
  18. Right click another message >> Copy to clipboard
  19. mWeb: Verify that main composer is focused
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

  1. Go to any chat
  2. Switch a message to edit mode
  3. Click Emoji button in the edit composer, leave the modal open
  4. Click the main composer
  5. Verify that the main composer is focused
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
web-compressed.mov
web1-compressed.mov
web2-compressed.mov
Mobile Web - Chrome
Screenrecording_20231004_163233.mp4
Screenrecording_20231004_163521.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
safari-compressed.mov
safari2-compressed.mov
Desktop
desktop-compressed.mov
iOS
ios-compressed.mov
ios2-compressed.mov
Android
android-compressed.mov
android-compressed.mov
android-compressed.mov

@tienifr tienifr changed the title fix: composer not focused on click Fix: Composer not focused on click while editor's emoji modal is open Sep 26, 2023
@MitchExpensify
Copy link
Contributor

When do you think this will be ready for review @tienifr ?

@tienifr tienifr marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 17:57
@tienifr tienifr requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2023 17:57
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from parasharrajat and removed request for a team October 4, 2023 17:57
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2023

@parasharrajat Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Oct 4, 2023

@parasharrajat The expected behaviors in above test cases are referenced from production.

@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ let mainComposerFocusCallback: FocusCallback | null = null;
* Typical uses of this would be call the focus on the ReportActionComposer.
*
* @param callback callback to register
* @param isMainComposer
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is no use of this unless you define the param via a comment.

@@ -517,7 +520,10 @@ function ComposerWithSuggestions({
onKeyPress={triggerHotkeyActions}
style={[styles.textInputCompose, isComposerFullSize ? styles.textInputFullCompose : styles.flex4]}
maxLines={maxComposerLines}
onFocus={onFocus}
onFocus={() => {
setUpComposeFocusManager(false);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you explain this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a note: Explained here #28238 (comment).

Comment on lines 133 to 140
/**
* Focus the composer text input
* @param {Boolean} [shouldDelay=false] Impose delay before focusing the composer
* @memberof ReportActionCompose
*/
const focus = useCallback((shouldDelay = false) => {
focusWithDelay(textInputRef.current)(shouldDelay);
}, []);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you recreate this if it was already present below? If you want to use useCallback, we can do so

Suggested change
/**
* Focus the composer text input
* @param {Boolean} [shouldDelay=false] Impose delay before focusing the composer
* @memberof ReportActionCompose
*/
const focus = useCallback((shouldDelay = false) => {
focusWithDelay(textInputRef.current)(shouldDelay);
}, []);
const focus = useCallback(focusWithDelay(textInputRef.current), []);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was referenced from ComposerWithSuggestions which allows the shouldDelay param:

const focus = useCallback((shouldDelay = false) => {
focusWithDelay(textInputRef.current)(shouldDelay);
}, []);

Anw, the former implementation without useCallback is still fine if you want to stick with it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, focusWithDelay is a curry function that returns a callback that accepts shouldDelay by default. IMO, it was done in this way to be explicit about parameters. If the suggested code works, let's do that instead.

const focus = useCallback(focusWithDelay(textInputRef.current), []);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This would cause lint error: ESLint: React Hook useCallback received a function whose dependencies are unknown. Pass an inline function instead. I think the implementation referenced from ComposerWithSuggestions is better.

Comment on lines 143 to 145
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.onComposerFocus(() => {
focus(true);
});
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.onComposerFocus(() => {
focus(true);
});
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.onComposerFocus(() => {
focus(true);
}, false);

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The dafault param for isMainComposer is false so no need to specify this again.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Oct 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it is more readable and understandable to be explicit about it.

@@ -145,6 +162,8 @@ function ReportActionItemMessageEdit(props) {
}

return () => {
ReportActionComposeFocusManager.clear();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

let's create a new effect for the setting of focus thing. We should not pollute other effects

Comment on lines 413 to 415
onPress={() => {
setUpComposeFocusManager();
}}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
onPress={() => {
setUpComposeFocusManager();
}}
onPress={setUpComposeFocusManager}

PLease add a comment

@@ -365,6 +379,7 @@ function ReportActionItemMessageEdit(props) {
setIsFocused(true);
reportScrollManager.scrollToIndex({animated: true, index: props.index}, true);
setShouldShowComposeInputKeyboardAware(false);
setUpComposeFocusManager();
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will cause recursion.

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat Oct 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In other words, We will resubscribe to focusHandler(ReportActionComposeFocusManager) every time, it gets focused where focus might be triggered from the same focushandler(ReportActionComposeFocusManager).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The purpose of this is to let the last focused composer to re-gain focus:

We need to make sure the ReportActionComposeFocusManager can handle both:

  • general composer (which includes the edit composer): If this is the last composer that was focused on, we want to refocus on this
  • main composer: If there's no last composer that was focused on before, this should be the fallback composer that we need to focus

This also explains why I did the same with ComposerWithSuggestions above.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tienifr tienifr Oct 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think this could cause recursion because focusCallback is overwritten.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From code perspective, previously the onComposerFocus callback was overwritten onFocus in Composer component. Thus if we removed the callback there, we need to do the same with parent composers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@tienifr tienifr Oct 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Speaking of this, I realized that we should not subscribe the focus callback when composer mounts but when it's focused instead. Subscribe on mount is redundant.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

But we blurred the input by clicking outside so no edit composer was focused, thus main composer should be focused. But I think it is not a big problem either can be focused.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Aug 28, 2024

BUG: Web: Edit comment does not focus the message being edited.

28.08.2024_22.12.12_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

BUG: Web: Main composer focus does not work.

28.08.2024_22.14.26_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@tienifr Do you know why we are seeing these issues now?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Aug 30, 2024

@parasharrajat Sorry for the delay, I'm checking now

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Aug 30, 2024

@parasharrajat Did you disable strict mode? Everything works well on my side without strict mode

web-resize.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Aha, damn StrictMode. I will recheck.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I will check this in 2 hours.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Sep 3, 2024

Screenshots

🔲 iOS / native

04.09.2024_12.43.24_REC.mp4

🔲 iOS / Safari

04.09.2024_12.45.41_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Desktop

04.09.2024_12.40.05_REC.mp4

🔲 MacOS / Chrome

04.09.2024_12.19.12_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / Chrome

04.09.2024_12.50.15_REC.mp4

🔲 Android / native

04.09.2024_14.36.27_REC.mp4

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

I noticed that focusing does not work properly on iOS Safari. When we edit a message while another edit composer is focused, focus does not switch to new edit composer. @tienifr

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

Overall, the PR looks good. I noticed that focus work different on safari mobile. What are your thoughts on this?

Also, on mweb chrome, the main composer does not hide when we edit a message.

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Sep 4, 2024

As soon as the above queries are cleared, I will complete the checklist. I have already tested the PR. @tienifr

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

parasharrajat commented Sep 5, 2024

@tienifr Would love to hear you first?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Sep 6, 2024

@parasharrajat I'm checking

@parasharrajat
Copy link
Member

@tienifr Anything?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Sep 7, 2024

@parasharrajat Here's what I found on Safari

the main composer does not hide when we edit a message.

Screen.Recording.2024-09-07.at.21.59.54.mov

When we edit a message while another edit composer is focused, focus does not switch to new edit composer

Screen.Recording.2024-09-07.at.22.04.21.mov

These issues happen even on staging, here's the logic to trigger focus on edit composer and hide main composer

focusTextInputAfterAnimation(textInputRef.current, 100);

but it doesn't work on Safari, I think it's because of the keyboard animation. After using setTimeout likes we already did in android native, it works well

const focusTextInputAfterAnimation: FocusTextInputAfterAnimation = (inputRef, animationLength = 0) => {
setTimeout(() => {
inputRef?.focus();
}, animationLength);
};

Screen.Recording.2024-09-07.at.22.08.21.mov

I'm not sure we should fix it here, since they already happen on staging/main and not really related to this issue. We can create the separate issue and find the deeper RCA

Copy link
Member

@parasharrajat parasharrajat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from johnmlee101 September 7, 2024 15:50
@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Sep 10, 2024

@johnmlee101 Can you take a look at this PR? Thanks

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Sep 11, 2024

@johnmlee101 friendly bump

@johnmlee101 johnmlee101 merged commit d389de2 into Expensify:main Sep 12, 2024
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/johnmlee101 in version: 9.0.34-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.34-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants