Plaid popup continue to open from resume app #29927

pradeepmdk · 2023-10-19T00:23:13Z

Details

fixed open the plaid popup when resume the app

Fixed Issues

$ #27616
PROPOSAL: #27616 (comment)

Tests

Go to account settings >> Workspace.
Click on the workspace to view its settings.
Click on Cards or Reimbursements settings.
Select "Connect bank account" >> "Connect online with Plaid."
Swipe down from the top of the device's screen to view notifications.
Swipe up to hide notifications.
Observe that the "Connect online with Plaid" popup opens again.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

same as test

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- If we are not using the full Onyx data that we loaded, I've added the proper selector in order to ensure the component only re-renders when the data it is using changes
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.5.45.22.AM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

out.mp4

iOS: Native

out.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

out.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

out.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

out.5.43.34.AM.mp4

melvin-bot · 2023-10-19T00:23:19Z

@situchan Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

situchan · 2023-10-19T15:35:33Z

src/components/PlaidLink/index.native.js

@@ -23,6 +24,10 @@ function PlaidLink(props) {
            },
        });

+        return () => {
+            dismissLink();


I see this is beyond the proposal. What does this fix?

Already there in my proposal. when a component is destroyed we need to dismiss the link when onexit event trigger plaid component will destroy based on this `subStep` https://github.com/Expensify/App/blob/c77814fd5e643cba78e8c8294370d78f633a59c5/src/pages/ReimbursementAccount/BankAccountPlaidStep.js#L105

Ah ok, but what does this fix exactly?
What issue do you have currently in production app? (without calling dismissLink on unmount)

This is good fix but just to confirm.

when the component is destroyed if the plaid popup opens means it will close the popup.
in the current issue was popup is opened repeatedly after resuming the app

ok so with this fix only, duplicated popup bug is replaced with repeatedly close & open popup 2 times.
So only 1 instance exists, which is a little better than original bug. But still we should fix this for better user experience which is the reason for introducing new Onyx key
Thanks for the explanation.

Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.11.24.10.PM.mov

situchan · 2023-10-19T18:12:35Z

Android bug: app restarts when open from launch icon (only on plaid screen)
Already happen on production so out of scope

Screen.Recording.2023-10-19.at.11.59.38.PM.mov

situchan · 2023-10-19T18:52:33Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web

web.mov

Mobile Web - Chrome

mchrome.mov

Mobile Web - Safari

msafari.mov

Desktop

desktop.mov

iOS

ios.mov

Android

android.mov

src/components/PlaidLink/index.native.js

pradeepmdk · 2023-10-20T23:11:50Z

@tgolen changes done

tgolen

Thank you for the changes. Sorry, I was OOO this week.

melvin-bot · 2023-10-27T14:46:32Z

@tgolen looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

tgolen · 2023-10-27T14:51:12Z

Hm, that's weird. I think all the tests were passing. The last commit shows passing tests... Maybe just a glitch in the matrix.

OSBotify · 2023-10-30T08:02:14Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.93-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-10-31T21:35:23Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.93-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-10-31T22:02:13Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.94-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-11-01T08:54:12Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.3.94-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2023-11-02T10:17:33Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.3.94-2 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

plaid modal opne

81c8c58

pradeepmdk requested a review from a team as a code owner October 19, 2023 00:23

melvin-bot bot requested review from situchan and removed request for a team October 19, 2023 00:23

situchan reviewed Oct 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

situchan approved these changes Oct 19, 2023

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen October 19, 2023 18:53

tgolen requested changes Oct 20, 2023

View reviewed changes

src/components/PlaidLink/index.native.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

add const values

60799d9

tgolen approved these changes Oct 27, 2023

View reviewed changes

tgolen merged commit 044eabe into Expensify:main Oct 27, 2023
11 checks passed

melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 27, 2023

tgolen removed the Emergency label Oct 27, 2023

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 30, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-10-30 #30560

Closed

melvin-bot bot mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2023

[HOLD for payment 2023-11-07] [$500] iOS: "Connect online with Plaid" popup is opened repeatedly after resuming the app. #27616

Closed

6 tasks

OSBotify mentioned this pull request Oct 31, 2023

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2023-10-31 #30662

Closed

97 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Plaid popup continue to open from resume app #29927

Plaid popup continue to open from resume app #29927

pradeepmdk commented Oct 19, 2023

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2023

situchan Oct 19, 2023

pradeepmdk Oct 19, 2023

situchan Oct 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading

pradeepmdk Oct 19, 2023

situchan Oct 19, 2023

situchan commented Oct 19, 2023

situchan commented Oct 19, 2023

pradeepmdk commented Oct 20, 2023

tgolen left a comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2023

tgolen commented Oct 27, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

OSBotify commented Nov 1, 2023

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2023

Plaid popup continue to open from resume app #29927

Plaid popup continue to open from resume app #29927

Conversation

pradeepmdk commented Oct 19, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 19, 2023

situchan Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pradeepmdk Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

situchan Oct 19, 2023 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pradeepmdk Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

situchan Oct 19, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

situchan commented Oct 19, 2023

situchan commented Oct 19, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

pradeepmdk commented Oct 20, 2023

tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 27, 2023

tgolen commented Oct 27, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 30, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

OSBotify commented Oct 31, 2023

OSBotify commented Nov 1, 2023

OSBotify commented Nov 2, 2023

situchan Oct 19, 2023 •

edited

Loading