Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix: Empty transaction data on log in #31302

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Nov 30, 2023
Merged

Conversation

tienifr
Copy link
Contributor

@tienifr tienifr commented Nov 14, 2023

Details

OpenApp API does not return transaction data thus on first load, transaction reports show 0.00 in title. This PR sets fallback title if transaction data has not been loaded yet.

Fixed Issues

$ #30687
PROPOSAL: #30687 (comment)

Tests

  1. Send a money request in the workspace chat
  2. Open transaction report
  3. Send message to another chat and stay there
  4. Log out
  5. Log in
  6. Verify that in LHN, the correct amount is shown in transaction report title
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

NA

QA Steps

  1. Send a money request in the workspace chat
  2. Open transaction report
  3. Send message to another chat and stay there
  4. Log out
  5. Log in
  6. Verify that in LHN, the correct amount is shown in transaction report title
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
      • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR author checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.19.56.37-compressed.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.20.04.47-compressed.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.19.49.41-compressed.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.19.52.29-compressed.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.19.45.22-compressed.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2023-11-14.at.19.54.37-compressed.mov

@tienifr tienifr marked this pull request as ready for review November 14, 2023 13:06
@tienifr tienifr requested a review from a team as a code owner November 14, 2023 13:06
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from fedirjh and removed request for a team November 14, 2023 13:06
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 14, 2023

@fedirjh Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 17, 2023

@fedirjh Can you check?

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 17, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
CleanShot.2023-11-20.at.02.23.16.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
CleanShot.2023-11-20.at.01.59.21.mp4
iOS: Native
CleanShot.2023-11-20.at.01.46.13.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
CleanShot.2023-11-20.at.01.49.58.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CleanShot.2023-11-19.at.23.04.48.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
CleanShot.2023-11-20.at.02.05.56.mp4

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 17, 2023

@tienifr it Looks we have a bug: The currency changes after opening older requests

CleanShot.2023-11-17.at.15.58.20.mp4

Comment on lines 1772 to 1774
if (_.isEmpty(transaction)) {
return lodashGet(reportAction, ['message', 0, 'text'], '').replace(/(\r\n|\n|\r)/gm, ' ');
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add a comment to the code.

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 22, 2023

The currency changes after opening older requests

@fedirjh I can't reproduce the issue. Can you verify if it also happens on staging or prod?

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 22, 2023

Can you verify if it also happens on staging or prod?

On staging I get the initial bug, the amount is displayed as $0 request:

CleanShot.2023-11-22.at.15.35.09.mp4

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 22, 2023

@tienifr I think I found the problem. It may be related to the backend?

Steps to reproduce :

  1. Open report with a user or workspace.
  2. Send new money request with currency USD and amount
  3. Open money request report
  4. Update the money request amount and currency to a different one
  5. Navigate to another report and send a message
  6. Log out
  7. Login again
  8. Check LHN, the money request report created in step 2 is displayed with the initial currency and amount.
  9. Open the money request report
  10. Check LHN and header are updated with the new currency and amount selected in step 4

Expected: LHN and money request header should display the correct data on the first load.

CleanShot.2023-11-22.at.16.24.43.mp4

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 22, 2023

@tienifr were you able to replicate the issue with these steps ?

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 23, 2023

Thanks, working on it.

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 24, 2023

Root cause is the changes in transaction details are not reflected in parent report action. There's no way we can retrieve them unless we open the transaction. I'm not sure if this is a BE bug. But if it's ok, I think it's safe just to fallback to Money request or TBD in any case.

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 24, 2023

Thank you @tienifr. It seems that we have limited options in this case.

cc @puneetlath I'd like your opinion on this. Currently, when a money request is updated (amount, date, etc.), the parentReportActionMessage doesn't reflect the changes, and this seems to be the intended behavior. Using the parentReportActionMessage as a fallback may show outdated data until the money request report is opened. Given our limited options, should we:

  1. Use parentReportActionMessage as a fallback and accept that old data might be displayed.
  2. Use Money request text as a fallback when the transaction is empty.

@puneetlath
Copy link
Contributor

I think I prefer 2. It will be more consistent.

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tienifr Let's move it forward.

src/libs/ReportUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 29, 2023

@tienifr Could you please merge main. It seems something was broken :

Screenshot 2023-11-29 at 1 00 06 AM

@tienifr

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tienifr

This comment was marked as resolved.

@tienifr
Copy link
Contributor Author

tienifr commented Nov 29, 2023

@fedirjh Things work fine now!

@fedirjh
Copy link
Contributor

fedirjh commented Nov 29, 2023

Updated Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.15.26.48.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.15.29.33.mp4
iOS: Native
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.02.13.25.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.14.25.13.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.14.26.35.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
CleanShot.2023-11-29.at.14.28.57.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@fedirjh fedirjh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me and tests well.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath November 29, 2023 14:34
@puneetlath puneetlath merged commit 9d0de25 into Expensify:main Nov 30, 2023
16 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 1, 2023

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.4.7-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Dec 5, 2023

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/yuwenmemon in version: 1.4.7-4 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants