Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

27168 Deeplinking not working after logout #31316

Conversation

lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor

@lukemorawski lukemorawski commented Nov 14, 2023

Details

This PR aims to fix a problem with deep links. When a user logs out and then tries to navigate using a deep link, the app does nothing. This is because the navigation action was dispatched before the nav tree changed. Navigation tree with all the protected routes (routes that are supposed to be accessible only by a logged in user) is rendered conditionally. After logging in, all the protected routes are rendered, but rebuilding the whole element tree takes a while.
To protect against that situation a helper method navContainsProtectedRoutes had been added to check if the nav state has the protected routes ready. This is done by checking if the routeNames array in the nav state contains any of the PROTECTED_SCREENS (a set of screen names that is available in the logged in state).
This is used by the waitForProtectedRoutes function, that returns a Promise which waits for the nav state to be in the logged in state and resolves immediately after this happens.
That is used used within the openReportFromDeepLink, that not only wait for the user to log in, but also now for the nav state to change.

Fixed Issues

$ #27168
PROPOSAL:

Tests

same as qa steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

same as qa steps

QA Steps

_ open mobile app (android or ios)

  • log in
  • log out
  • run npx uri-scheme open "new-expensify://settings/profile/personal-details/date-of-birth" --ios (change to --android if your running an android app)
  • log in again
  • app should navigate to the screen from the link
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
native.android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
web.android.mov
iOS: Native
native.ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
web.ios.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.desktop.mov
MacOS: Desktop
native.desktop.mov

@lukemorawski lukemorawski marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 12:47
@lukemorawski lukemorawski requested a review from a team as a code owner November 15, 2023 12:47
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from narefyev91 and removed request for a team November 15, 2023 12:47
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Nov 15, 2023

@narefyev91 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

narefyev91 commented Nov 15, 2023

@lukemorawski there are some issues which i see between desktop and web (seems the same issues described here #29688 (comment))

Screen.Recording.2023-11-15.at.16.22.49.mov
Screen.Recording.2023-11-15.at.16.24.31.mov

@lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@narefyev91 can't really recreate that in dev mode as pasting a url starting from dev.new.expensify.com won't trigger a deep link that opens the dev desktop app. I was testing it in a rather roundabout way, by manually opening the link from the terminal and it worked.
Do you have any idea how to provoke the same behaviour in dev env?

@lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukemorawski commented Nov 15, 2023

@narefyev91
ok, so it seems that this PR didn't introduced this issue.
I've switched to main and did the following test:

  • run the web app in safari
  • run the electron app
  • replaced the url origin from 'https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082' to 'new-expensify://' and retained the path
  • pressed enter - that's asking to open the electron app
  • electron app opens
    Now, if the url path has a preciding / then everything is fine:
    'new-expensify:///r/2712474404746581'
    but if that / is missing then we get the issue you mentioned
    'new-expensify://r/2712474404746581'
    I'm not sure why that happens but IMHO it's something that is not related to the issue this PR tries to fix. More like a deep link url parsing.

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

narefyev91 commented Nov 15, 2023

@narefyev91 ok, so it seems that this PR didn't introduced this issue. I've switched to main and did the following test:

  • run the web app in safari
  • run the electron app
  • replaced the url origin from 'https://dev.new.expensify.com:8082' to 'new-expensify://' and retained the path
  • pressed enter - that's asking to open the electron app
  • electron app opens
    Now, if the url path has a preciding / then everything is fine:
    'new-expensify:///r/2712474404746581'
    but if that / is missing then we get the issue you mentioned
    'new-expensify://r/2712474404746581'
    I'm not sure why that happens but IMHO it's something that is not related to the issue this PR tries to fix. More like a deep link url parsing.

yup i also saw that issue already presented on main - but we need to be sure that this flow is not happened #29688 (comment) - because that were the main issues

@lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also i do not see android mWeb video in your checklist

@narefyev91 android web video is under Android: mWeb Chrome details section in the description

@lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

lukemorawski commented Nov 15, 2023

yup i also saw that issue already presented on main - but we need to be sure that this flow is not happened #29688 (comment) - because that were the main issues

@narefyev91 ok, but shouldn't this be a separate ticket then? changes in this PR where reverted last time, because it was falsy thought that it create a regression, when in fact, that regression (that you mention in the linked comment) was already present in the code.
I think the best solution would be to create a separate ticket for the issue from the comment and proceed with this one as it's quite critical and fixes issue unrelated to the previously mentioned comment

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

narefyev91 commented Nov 15, 2023

@lukemorawski strange issue happened - when i just try to paste any url in the link for android mWeb - it shows me not found page - but if i rollback all your code - everything is working....

Screen.Recording.2023-11-15.at.17.26.22.mov

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

Hmmm also i'm wondering - in all your videos you still use port 8082? Do you use old videos?

@lukemorawski
Copy link
Contributor Author

web.android.working.url.change.mov

works for me. Actually your video uses the old version accessing the app in the browser. Now it's done using https. And it's still running on 8082

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

web.android.working.url.change.mov
works for me. Actually your video uses the old version accessing the app in the browser. Now it's done using https. And it's still running on 8082

yup i using new one https://10.0.2.2:8082
Just changed the port - and still have issue

@narefyev91
Copy link
Contributor

narefyev91 commented Nov 15, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Web
8mb.video-cCZ-THl8R8j1.mp4
Mobile Web - Chrome
android-web.mp4
Mobile Web - Safari
ios-web.mp4
ios-web2.mp4
Desktop
desktop.mp4
iOS
ios2.mp4
8mb.video-dBA-vriQC3fw.mp4
Android
android.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@narefyev91 narefyev91 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from thienlnam November 15, 2023 16:48
@thienlnam thienlnam merged commit ff4c947 into Expensify:main Nov 19, 2023
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 1.4.1-13 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@Julesssss
Copy link
Contributor

This PR likely introduced this bug

Comment on lines +2005 to +2006
Session.waitForUserSignIn().then(() => {
Navigation.waitForProtectedRoutes().then(() => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This wait promise callback although it solves the original issue, it revealed a hidden bug #33001.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants