Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS Migration] Migrate EReceiptThumbnail.js component to TypeScript #32913

Merged

Conversation

JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski JKobrynski commented Dec 12, 2023

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #31956
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

(By @grgia)

I think the best way to QA this in DEV is to test the component in the storybook build and look at the EReceiptThumbnail, EReceipt, and ReportPreview stories.

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

(by @grgia)

As for production QA tests that cover the EReceiptThumbnail,
We can:
1 . Create a report with 1 - 3 Expensify Card Transactions

  • Note: you can do this in OldDot or NewDot. If done in OldDot, use the reportID from the URL and paste it into NewDot to access the report r/
  1. Ensure that the ReportPreview in the parent chat displays the 1-3 EReceipt Previews ✅
  2. Click on the ReportPreview to open the Expense Report.
  3. Ensure that each expense displays the correct MCC logo ✅
  4. Click on each expense -> Opens MoneyRequest Page -> Click on EReceipt Preview -> Opens EReceipt Page
  5. Ensure that the color and MCC logo is consistent on all pages ✅
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android

Android: mWeb Chrome

chrome

iOS: Native

ios

iOS: mWeb Safari

safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web

MacOS: Desktop

desktop

src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/components/EReceiptThumbnail.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/styles/utils/index.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@VickyStash VickyStash left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@JKobrynski JKobrynski changed the title [TS Migration] Migrate EReceiptThumbnail.js component to TypeScript [No QA] [TS Migration] Migrate EReceiptThumbnail.js component to TypeScript Dec 13, 2023
@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM! @JKobrynski

@JKobrynski JKobrynski marked this pull request as ready for review December 14, 2023 14:55
@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested a review from a team as a code owner December 14, 2023 14:55
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from 0xmiros and removed request for a team December 14, 2023 14:55
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 14, 2023

@0xmiroslav Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 21, 2023

Author Checklist seems failing

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 21, 2023

There are 3 checklist items added recently

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@0xmiroslav checklist fixed!

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 26, 2023

Agree this is hard to test externally.
In dev, we can use test Onyx data in #29474.
And "No QA" makes sense since I don't think QA team is able to test. If assigned engineer thinks otherwise, I let them take action.

@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Dec 26, 2023

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android / native
    • Android / Chrome
    • iOS / native
    • iOS / Safari
    • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS / Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(themeColors.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
mchrome.mov
iOS: Native
ios.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
msafari.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@0xmiros 0xmiros left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Dec 26, 2023

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #31956 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen December 26, 2023 05:46
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am learning a lot about TS through these migrations!

Comment on lines 22 to 24
/** TransactionID of the transaction this EReceipt corresponds to
* It's used by withOnyx HOC
*/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** TransactionID of the transaction this EReceipt corresponds to
* It's used by withOnyx HOC
*/
/** TransactionID used by withOnyx of the transaction this EReceipt corresponds to */

Prop comments are preferred to be single lines.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

const onContainerLayout = (event) => {
const backgroundImage = useMemo(() => backgroundImages[StyleUtils.getEReceiptColorCode(transaction)], [StyleUtils, transaction]);

// Get receipt colorway, or default to Yellow.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
// Get receipt colorway, or default to Yellow.

I think this comment can be removed, it is not valuable and I don't think it's accurate anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated

const backgroundImage = useMemo(() => backgroundImages[StyleUtils.getEReceiptColorCode(transaction)], [StyleUtils, transaction]);

// Get receipt colorway, or default to Yellow.
const colorStyles = StyleUtils.getEReceiptColorStyles(StyleUtils.getEReceiptColorCode(transaction));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't these consts (and many others in this file) have type declarations?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Typescript is automatically inferring it from the the return type of getEReceiptColorStyles function:

image

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Dec 26, 2023

Oh, also, please do add QA tests. I would suggest looking through the git blame to find when the feature was implemented and see how it was originally QAed. That might give you some insight into how to test it.

@blazejkustra
Copy link
Contributor

@JKobrynski Bump for once you are back 😄

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen this is the PR that introduced this component, it also describes quite a tricky way of testing it 😅 do you think we should do the same for this one?

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jan 2, 2024

Thanks for finding that. I am pretty worried that we have a flow that isn't covered by any QA tests or regression tests. There would be no way for us to know whether this is working or not until we hear about it from our customers. @grgia Could you please help write up some QA tests that Applause can perform for testing e-receipts?

@grgia
Copy link
Contributor

grgia commented Jan 3, 2024

@tgolen
I think the best way to QA this in DEV is to test the component in the storybook build and look at the EReceiptThumbnail, EReceipt, and ReportPreview stories.

As for production QA tests that cover the EReceiptThumbnail,
We can:
1 . Create a report with 1 - 3 Expensify Card Transactions
- Note: you can do this in OldDot or NewDot. If done in OldDot, use the reportID from the URL and paste it into NewDot to access the report r/<reportID>
2. Ensure that the ReportPreview in the parent chat displays the 1-3 EReceipt Previews ✅
3. Click on the ReportPreview to open the Expense Report.
4. Ensure that each expense displays the correct MCC logo ✅
5. Click on each expense -> Opens MoneyRequest Page -> Click on EReceipt Preview -> Opens EReceipt Page
6. Ensure that the color and MCC logo is consistent on all pages ✅

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jan 4, 2024

Thanks, Georgia! @JKobrynski Can you work those into the QA tests, please? Also, it looks like you picked up a conflict.

@JKobrynski JKobrynski changed the title [No QA] [TS Migration] Migrate EReceiptThumbnail.js component to TypeScript [TS Migration] Migrate EReceiptThumbnail.js component to TypeScript Jan 8, 2024
@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen updated, conflicts resolved!

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jan 8, 2024

Thanks for adding the QA tests. Can you please clean them up a little?

  • Put the local testing steps in the "Test" section
  • Put the production testing steps in the "QA Steps" section

@JKobrynski
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tgolen done!

@JKobrynski JKobrynski requested a review from tgolen January 9, 2024 07:40
@0xmiros
Copy link
Contributor

0xmiros commented Jan 9, 2024

Lint failing

@tgolen tgolen merged commit 108b5e0 into Expensify:main Jan 9, 2024
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Jan 9, 2024

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.24-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 1.4.24-3 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants