Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[TS migration] Migrate WorkspaceReimburse Page #35399

Conversation

ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor

Details

[TS migration] Migrate WorkspaceReimburse page to TypeScript

Fixed Issues

$ #25211
PROPOSAL: N/A

Tests

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Test WorkspaceReimburse Pages:

  • Log in into an account that is a workspace admin
  • Navigate to Workspace
  • Go to Settings -> Reimburse
  • All the screen button work
  • Pressing

Offline tests

N/A

QA Steps

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Same as in the Tests section.

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android-native.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-web.mov
iOS: Native
ios-native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-web.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
macos-web.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
macos-desktop.mov

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

Comment on lines 72 to 74
if (onInputChange) {
onInputChange(inputValue);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (onInputChange) {
onInputChange(inputValue);
}
onInputChange?.(inputValue);

Comment on lines 78 to 80
if (onInputChange) {
onInputChange(inputValue, index);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
if (onInputChange) {
onInputChange(inputValue, index);
}
onInputChange?.(inputValue, index);


const getUnitLabel = useCallback((value) => translate(`common.${value}`), [translate]);
const getUnitLabel = useCallback((value: Unit) => translate(`common.${value}`), [translate]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const getUnitLabel = useCallback((value: Unit) => translate(`common.${value}`), [translate]);
const getUnitLabel = useCallback((value: Unit): string => translate(`common.${value}`), [translate]);

const distanceCustomUnit = _.find(lodashGet(props.policy, 'customUnits', {}), (unit) => unit.name === CONST.CUSTOM_UNITS.NAME_DISTANCE);
const distanceCustomRate = _.find(lodashGet(distanceCustomUnit, 'rates', {}), (rate) => rate.name === CONST.CUSTOM_UNITS.DEFAULT_RATE);
const {translate, toLocaleDigit} = props;
const [currentRatePerUnit, setCurrentRatePerUnit] = useState<string | undefined>('');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
const [currentRatePerUnit, setCurrentRatePerUnit] = useState<string | undefined>('');
const [currentRatePerUnit, setCurrentRatePerUnit] = useState<string>('');

Comment on lines 51 to 53
if (!customUnitRate) {
return undefined;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's update getUnitRateValue typing instead, it looks like it already can handle the case where customUnitRate is undefined

Suggested change
if (!customUnitRate) {
return undefined;
}

Comment on lines 70 to 75
type UpdateCustomUnit = {
customUnitID: string;
name: string;
attributes: Attributes;
rates: Rate;
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also maybe I'd rename it to NewCustomUnit or CustomUnitUpdate

Suggested change
type UpdateCustomUnit = {
customUnitID: string;
name: string;
attributes: Attributes;
rates: Rate;
};
type UpdateCustomUnit = CustomUnit & {
rates: Rate;
};

Navigation.goBack(ROUTES.WORKSPACE_REIMBURSE.getRoute(policy?.id ?? ''));
};

const validate = (values: OnyxFormValuesFields<typeof ONYXKEYS.FORMS.WORKSPACE_RATE_AND_UNIT_FORM>) => {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's add return type

role={CONST.ROLE.PRESENTATION}
inputID="rate"
containerStyles={[styles.mt4]}
defaultValue={distanceCustomRate ? PolicyUtils.getUnitRateValue(distanceCustomRate, toLocaleDigit) : ''}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same, update getUnitRateValue typing instead

maxLength={12}
/>

<View style={[styles.mt4]}>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<View style={[styles.mt4]}>
<View style={styles.mt4}>

const hasVBA = achState === BankAccount.STATE.OPEN;
const reimburseReceiptsUrl = `reports?policyID=${props.policy.id}&from=all&type=expense&showStates=Archived&isAdvancedFilterMode=true`;
const isLoading = lodashGet(props.reimbursementAccount, 'isLoading', false);
const reimburseReceiptsUrl = `reports?policyID=${policy?.id ?? ''}&from=all&type=expense&showStates=Archived&isAdvancedFilterMode=true`;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we extract this url to CONST?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you mean add this into the CONST file?

@ruben-rebelo ruben-rebelo force-pushed the ts-migration/workspacereimburse-page branch from 6dcbdc6 to 4feb092 Compare February 1, 2024 09:47
lastModified: PropTypes.number,
}).isRequired,

type WorkspaceReimburseViewOnyxProps = {
/** From Onyx */
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
/** From Onyx */

},
};

Policy.updateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRate(policy?.id ?? '', distanceCustomUnit, newCustomUnit, parseInt(policy?.lastModified ?? '', 2));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please update updateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRate typing instead

Suggested change
Policy.updateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRate(policy?.id ?? '', distanceCustomUnit, newCustomUnit, parseInt(policy?.lastModified ?? '', 2));
Policy.updateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRate(policy?.id ?? '', distanceCustomUnit, newCustomUnit, policy?.lastModified);

Comment on lines 86 to 90
if (!rateValueRegex.test(values.rate.toString()) || values.rate.toString() === 'Nan') {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.invalidRateError';
} else if (NumberUtils.parseFloatAnyLocale(values.rate.toString()) <= 0) {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.lowRateError';
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's have the old logic and update rate type in values to string instead

Suggested change
if (!rateValueRegex.test(values.rate.toString()) || values.rate.toString() === 'Nan') {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.invalidRateError';
} else if (NumberUtils.parseFloatAnyLocale(values.rate.toString()) <= 0) {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.lowRateError';
}
if (!rateValueRegex.test(values.rate) || values.rate === '') {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.invalidRateError';
} else if (NumberUtils.parseFloatAnyLocale(values.rate) <= 0) {
errors.rate = 'workspace.reimburse.lowRateError';
}

# Conflicts:
#	src/ONYXKEYS.ts
#	src/pages/workspace/reimburse/WorkspaceRateAndUnitPage.js
#	src/pages/workspace/reimburse/WorkspaceReimbursePage.js
#	src/pages/workspace/reimburse/WorkspaceReimburseView.tsx
#	src/types/onyx/index.ts
# Conflicts:
#	src/ONYXKEYS.ts
#	src/libs/DistanceRequestUtils.ts
#	src/libs/actions/Policy.ts
#	src/pages/workspace/reimburse/WorkspaceReimburseView.tsx
#	src/types/onyx/Form.ts
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
type UpdateWorkspaceCustomUnitAndRateParams = {
policyID: string;
lastModified: number;
lastModified?: number | string;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
lastModified?: number | string;
lastModified?: string;


type FormValueType = string | boolean | Date | OnyxCommon.Errors;
type FormValueType = string | boolean | Date | number | OnyxCommon.Errors;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why number it added, I've tried to remove it and ts check pass

Comment on lines 130 to 142
<OfflineWithFeedback
pendingAction={distanceCustomUnit?.pendingAction ?? distanceCustomRate?.pendingAction}
shouldShowErrorMessages={false}
>
<MenuItemWithTopDescription
title={currentRatePerUnit}
description={translate('workspace.reimburse.trackDistanceRate')}
shouldShowRightIcon
onPress={() => Navigation.navigate(ROUTES.WORKSPACE_RATE_AND_UNIT.getRoute(policy?.id ?? ''))}
wrapperStyle={[styles.mhn5, styles.wAuto]}
brickRoadIndicator={(distanceCustomUnit?.errors ?? distanceCustomRate?.errors) && CONST.BRICK_ROAD_INDICATOR_STATUS.ERROR}
/>
</OfflineWithFeedback>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why was it added, the code looks really similar to the code block above, maybe you did a mistake during conflicts resolution?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right! It was badly conflicts merge! Thank you!

const currentCustomUnitRate = Object.values(distanceCustomUnit?.rates ?? {}).find((r) => r.name === CONST.CUSTOM_UNITS.DEFAULT_RATE);
const unitID = distanceCustomUnit.customUnitID ?? '';
const unitName = distanceCustomUnit.name ?? '';
const rateNumValue = PolicyUtils.getNumericValue(rate, toLocaleDigit) as number;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What if we use Number(rateNumValue) instead of assertion?

Suggested change
const rateNumValue = PolicyUtils.getNumericValue(rate, toLocaleDigit) as number;
const rateNumValue = PolicyUtils.getNumericValue(rate, toLocaleDigit);

attributes: {unit},
rates: {
...currentCustomUnitRate,
rate: rateNumValue * CONST.POLICY.CUSTOM_UNIT_RATE_BASE_OFFSET,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
rate: rateNumValue * CONST.POLICY.CUSTOM_UNIT_RATE_BASE_OFFSET,
rate: Number(rateNumValue) * CONST.POLICY.CUSTOM_UNIT_RATE_BASE_OFFSET,

@ruben-rebelo ruben-rebelo marked this pull request as ready for review February 13, 2024 09:34
@ruben-rebelo ruben-rebelo requested a review from a team as a code owner February 13, 2024 09:34
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from Ollyws and removed request for a team February 13, 2024 09:34
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 13, 2024

@Ollyws Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 15, 2024

Will get to this one tomorrow.

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 16, 2024

@ruben-rebelo Could you have a look at those merge conflicts? Thanks!

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 22, 2024

@ruben-rebelo Seems there are some lint/typecheck errors.

@ruben-rebelo ruben-rebelo force-pushed the ts-migration/workspacereimburse-page branch from da439a9 to 34135a2 Compare February 22, 2024 14:53
# Conflicts:
#	src/ONYXKEYS.ts
#	src/libs/PolicyUtils.ts
#	src/libs/actions/Policy.ts
#	src/pages/workspace/reimburse/WorkspaceReimburseView.tsx
#	src/types/onyx/Form.ts
#	src/types/onyx/Policy.ts
#	src/types/onyx/index.ts
@ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws It seems the conflicts were wrongly resolved.
I've reverted the merge and resolved the conflicts again.
Please take a look

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 23, 2024

@ruben-rebelo Still got a typecheck error there if you could take a look, thanks!

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 27, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
01_Android_Native.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
02_Android_Chrome.mp4
iOS: Native
03_iOS_Native.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
04_iOS_Safari.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
05_MacOS_Chrome.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
06_MacOS_Desktop.mp4

Copy link
Contributor

@Ollyws Ollyws left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 27, 2024

We did not find an internal engineer to review this PR, trying to assign a random engineer to #25211 as well as to this PR... Please reach out for help on Slack if no one gets assigned!

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Feb 27, 2024

@ruben-rebelo could you please run npm run prettier to get rid of the lint error, thanks!

@ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Ollyws Friendly bump

@Ollyws
Copy link
Contributor

Ollyws commented Mar 4, 2024

Just waiting on @tylerkaraszewski's review.

# Conflicts:
#	src/libs/DistanceRequestUtils.ts
@tylerkaraszewski
Copy link
Contributor

Conflicts.

@ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tylerkaraszewski Conflicts resolved. Thanks!

@tylerkaraszewski
Copy link
Contributor

Tests are currently failing.

@tylerkaraszewski
Copy link
Contributor

Also, conflicts.

@ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tylerkaraszewski PR updated and conflicts resolved

@tylerkaraszewski
Copy link
Contributor

Performance tests aren't currently passing.

@fabioh8010
Copy link
Contributor

@ruben-rebelo Could you check this? Thanks!

@ruben-rebelo
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tylerkaraszewski It needed merge with main. Tests are now passing.

@tylerkaraszewski tylerkaraszewski merged commit 107b378 into Expensify:main Mar 22, 2024
15 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants