fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37479

dukenv0307 · 2024-02-29T08:22:20Z

Details

Fixed Issues

$ #37287
PROPOSAL: #37287 (comment)

Tests

Go to workspace chat.
Click + > Request money > Manual.
Proceed to confirmation page.
Click Category.
Select a category.
Click Category.
Search for the category selected in Step 4.
Verify that: The selected category will be ticked in the search result as it is selected.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Go to workspace chat.
Click + > Request money > Manual.
Proceed to confirmation page.
Click Category.
Select a category.
Click Category.
Search for the category selected in Step 4.
Verify that: The selected category will be ticked in the search result as it is selected.

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
- I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
- I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
- I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
- I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
- I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  - If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

android.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

android-mweb.mov

iOS: Native

ios.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

ios-mweb.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

web.mov

MacOS: Desktop

desktop.mov

…sult

melvin-bot · 2024-02-29T08:38:49Z

@rushatgabhane Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

rushatgabhane · 2024-02-29T19:41:12Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is approved by marketing by adding the Waiting for Copy label for a copy review on the original GH to get the correct copy.
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

MacOS: Desktop

rushatgabhane

LGTM

rushatgabhane · 2024-02-29T20:40:27Z

src/libs/OptionsListUtils.ts

+            .filter((category) => category.name.toLowerCase().includes(searchInputValue.toLowerCase()))
+            .map((category) => ({
+                ...category,
+                isSelected: selectedOptions.some((selectedOption) => selectedOption.name === category.name),


@dukenv0307 @puneetlath should we optimize this? This is a O(N^2) call for every key press on searching.

N is the number of categories that match the search text.

We have a list of selected options and a list unselected, why rebuild the list? What do you think? I hope im not prematurely optimizing

Yeah, ideally there is a more performant way we could do this.

@rushatgabhane i just updated the code, please check again

@dukenv0307 we don't need to recalculate the selected options on every keypress.

eg: we are calculating the enabled categories only once over here -
https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/37479/files#diff-7d43f3c3e4decdb0057928e895f456d51c0f4081837edd5e2c4ed7ddd570e274R947

@rushatgabhane Currently, we only calculate searchCategories based on searchInputValue and enabledCategories by adding isSelected = true field to the enabledCategories for all categories in the selectedOptions array

ah okay, thanks! i was misunderstood

rushatgabhane

LGTM! @puneetlath

dukenv0307 · 2024-03-12T03:43:40Z

@puneetlath Please review this when you get a chance

OSBotify · 2024-03-12T21:33:04Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2024-03-13T19:59:24Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/puneetlath in version: 1.4.52-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-03-15T10:15:45Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/Beamanator in version: 1.4.52-6 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search re…

d897d2e

…sult

dukenv0307 marked this pull request as ready for review February 29, 2024 08:38

dukenv0307 requested a review from a team as a code owner February 29, 2024 08:38

melvin-bot bot requested review from rushatgabhane and removed request for a team February 29, 2024 08:38

dukenv0307 mentioned this pull request Feb 29, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-03-22] [$500] Category - Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37287

Closed

6 tasks

rushatgabhane approved these changes Feb 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from puneetlath February 29, 2024 20:35

rushatgabhane reviewed Feb 29, 2024

View reviewed changes

dukenv0307 added 2 commits March 4, 2024 15:43

Optimize logic get search categories

bbcaad4

Merge branch 'main' into fix/37287

66f081b

rushatgabhane approved these changes Mar 7, 2024

View reviewed changes

dukenv0307 mentioned this pull request Mar 11, 2024

fix selected parent category is not displayed as selected #37805

Merged

50 tasks

puneetlath approved these changes Mar 12, 2024

View reviewed changes

puneetlath merged commit ffb9933 into Expensify:main Mar 12, 2024
18 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-03-13 #38257

Closed

74 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37479

fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37479

dukenv0307 commented Feb 29, 2024

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 29, 2024

rushatgabhane commented Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane left a comment

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

puneetlath Mar 1, 2024

dukenv0307 Mar 4, 2024

rushatgabhane Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

dukenv0307 Mar 6, 2024

rushatgabhane Mar 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane left a comment

dukenv0307 commented Mar 12, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 13, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 15, 2024

fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37479

fix: Selected category is not ticked when it appears in the search result #37479

Conversation

dukenv0307 commented Feb 29, 2024

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Feb 29, 2024

rushatgabhane commented Feb 29, 2024 • edited Loading

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

puneetlath Mar 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dukenv0307 Mar 4, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rushatgabhane Mar 5, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dukenv0307 Mar 6, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rushatgabhane Mar 7, 2024 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rushatgabhane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

dukenv0307 commented Mar 12, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 12, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 13, 2024

OSBotify commented Mar 15, 2024

rushatgabhane commented Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane Feb 29, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane Mar 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rushatgabhane Mar 7, 2024 •

edited

Loading