Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: cache extra attributes for video markdown conversion #42463

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jun 19, 2024

Conversation

dominictb
Copy link
Contributor

@dominictb dominictb commented May 22, 2024

Details

  1. New expensify-common version -> Support video tag conversion
  2. Support cache the extra attributes from video so the user cannot edit it.

Fixed Issues

$ #41952
PROPOSAL: #41952 (comment)

Tests

To test, please use this branch of expensify-common: Expensify/expensify-common#703

  1. Start editing any comment with video
  2. Edit the markdown in the composer (try not to edit the markdown section containing video data)
  3. Verify that the video still shows normally after editing

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Start editing any comment with video
  2. Edit the markdown in the composer (try not to edit the markdown section containing video data)
  3. Verify that the video still shows normally after editing
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android1.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
android.mp4
iOS: Native

Uploading ios8.mp4…

iOS: mWeb Safari
iosweb.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web8.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-06-12.at.00.07.27.mov

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: This PR will needed to be reviewed and merged first: Expensify/expensify-common#703

@dominictb dominictb marked this pull request as ready for review June 6, 2024 10:41
@dominictb dominictb requested a review from a team as a code owner June 6, 2024 10:41
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot removed the request for review from a team June 6, 2024 10:41
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 6, 2024

@DylanDylann Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@deetergp
Copy link
Contributor

deetergp commented Jun 6, 2024

I left a comment on Expensify/expensify-common#703 that @DylanDylann should review that one too since it's tightly coupled with this one. Please let me know if that isn't possible or is unreasonable. Thanks!

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@dominictb Please fill out the desktop video and resolve conflict + typescript error. Thanks

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann typescript issue is due to the expensify-common package not updated. Please review the PR on expensify-common first.

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann all good now (Desktop video added). You have to test along side with expensify-common change. The TS error will be automatically fixed once the lib PR is merged.

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann can you start reviewing? Thanks!

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

Whoops, I am reviewing. It could take me a couple of days to review this PR

const videoAttributesCache: Record<string, string> = {};
const originalMessage = parser.htmlToMarkdown(action.message?.[0]?.html ?? '', {
cacheVideoAttributes: (videoSource, attrs) => {
videoAttributesCache[videoSource] = attrs;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dominictb Hi, Why don't we directly set attrs to draftMessageVideoAttributeCache? With this, we can move the clear function to above

@dominictb dominictb requested a review from DylanDylann June 13, 2024 11:20
Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann DylanDylann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for your quick update. Everything else looks good. Testing now

src/libs/actions/Report.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

DylanDylann commented Jun 13, 2024

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.12.01.33.mov
Android: mWeb Chrome
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.11.47.55.mov
iOS: Native
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.11.55.29.mov
iOS: mWeb Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.11.47.11.mov
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.11.36.26.mov
MacOS: Desktop
Screen.Recording.2024-06-19.at.11.42.21.mov

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@dominictb whoops, we have a minor lint error. Let's address it, too

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen @dominictb I wonder if the user tries to edit the video source. What should happen? Currently, if users try to edit the video source, the App displays the infinity load, they still can download this video but can't open

Screen.Recording.2024-06-13.at.19.13.55.mov

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jun 13, 2024

I think we should just do whatever GitHub does (which I assume is just allowing people to break it).

@DylanDylann
Copy link
Contributor

DylanDylann commented Jun 14, 2024

I think we should just do whatever GitHub does (which I assume is just allowing people to break it).

I see that GH only converts to video tag if the source is valid. If users try to break the source by editing it, GH will not convert the markdown to video tag.

It maybe require support from BE to validate the video source. @dominictb Do you have any suggestions for this?

@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see that GH only converts to
It maybe require support from BE to validate the video source

I would suggest @tgolen to bring this to the internal team for issue triage.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jun 14, 2024

OK, I can bring this up internally to get some thoughts on it, but let's not let that hold up this PR. I think we can handle what to do about broken video links in a separate issue.

@tgolen
Copy link
Contributor

tgolen commented Jun 14, 2024

I brought this up in Slack (but it's an internal channel, so you won't have access). I'm just keeping a paper-trail going.

@dominictb dominictb requested a review from DylanDylann June 18, 2024 01:29
@dominictb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@DylanDylann @tgolen this is ready for review!

Copy link
Contributor

@tgolen tgolen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Following up from the previous discussion about what to do if users break the URLs, we've agreed internally to ignore that edge case for now and if a user breaks a URL, it's on them.

Copy link
Contributor

@DylanDylann DylanDylann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from tgolen June 19, 2024 05:08
@tgolen tgolen merged commit 768da63 into Expensify:main Jun 19, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

1 similar comment
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/tgolen in version: 1.4.86-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/AndrewGable in version: 9.0.0-9 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅

@dominictb dominictb deleted the fix/41952 branch July 18, 2024 02:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants