fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params #44520

dominictb · 2024-06-27T04:57:33Z

Details

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params

Fixed Issues

$ #41017
PROPOSAL: #41017 (comment)

Tests

Navigate to NewDot on mobile web
Navigate to a group chat/workspace chat
Click on the header -> Navigate to the details page
Reload the details page
Click on the app back icon

Verify that: the app will go back to the report screen, not to the LHN

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Navigate to NewDot on mobile web
Navigate to a group chat/workspace chat
Click on the header -> Navigate to the details page
Reload the details page
Click on the app back icon

Verify that: the app will go back to the report screen, not to the LHN

Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

aweb.webm

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-06-27.at.14.14.51.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-06-27.at.14.15.17.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com> fix: prettier Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

melvin-bot · 2024-06-27T07:18:02Z

@ishpaul777 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

src/libs/ReportUtils.ts

ishpaul777 · 2024-07-02T20:51:44Z

will priortize a rereview for Thursday. 🙇

ishpaul777 · 2024-07-08T11:30:41Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.1.33.51.AM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.1.44.27.AM.mov

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.1.50.30.AM.mov

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.1.54.50.AM.mov

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.12.27.39.AM.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-07-09.at.2.10.42.AM.mov

ishpaul777 · 2024-07-08T21:06:01Z

@dominictb Please merge main

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

dominictb · 2024-07-09T09:52:42Z

done!

OSBotify · 2024-07-09T17:40:50Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

OSBotify · 2024-07-10T11:19:53Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.0.6-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-07-10T11:37:07Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/roryabraham in version: 9.0.6-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-07-11T10:17:22Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.6-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	failure ❌
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

OSBotify · 2024-07-11T10:36:58Z

🚀 Cherry-picked to staging by https://github.com/Julesssss in version: 9.0.6-1 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

@Expensify/applauseleads please QA this PR and check it off on the deploy checklist if it passes.

OSBotify · 2024-07-15T20:21:44Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.6-8 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

OSBotify · 2024-07-17T00:19:04Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/thienlnam in version: 9.0.7-8 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	failure ❌
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	failure ❌
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

dominictb added 2 commits June 27, 2024 11:53

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params

a885e27

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

fix: lint

52557fc

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com> fix: prettier Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

dominictb marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2024 07:17

dominictb requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2024 07:17

melvin-bot bot requested review from ishpaul777 and removed request for a team June 27, 2024 07:18

ishpaul777 reviewed Jul 1, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/libs/ReportUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

dominictb added 2 commits July 2, 2024 09:24

fix: remove doesReportExist fn in ReportUtils

a01bd92

fix: lint issue

467bccf

dominictb added 3 commits July 9, 2024 16:44

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/41017-refresh-rhp

944b56e

fix: use ReportConnection func

3d96978

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

fix: prettier

f20710d

Signed-off-by: dominictb <tb-dominic@outlook.com>

ishpaul777 approved these changes Jul 9, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from roryabraham July 9, 2024 16:35

roryabraham approved these changes Jul 9, 2024

View reviewed changes

roryabraham merged commit 87dba8c into Expensify:main Jul 9, 2024
15 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-07-10 #45144

Closed

dominictb deleted the fix/41017-refresh-rhp branch July 18, 2024 02:46

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params #44520

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params #44520

dominictb commented Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2024

ishpaul777 commented Jul 2, 2024

ishpaul777 commented Jul 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ishpaul777 commented Jul 8, 2024

dominictb commented Jul 9, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 9, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 10, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 10, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 15, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 17, 2024

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params #44520

fix: return to report screen if RHP has valid reportID params #44520

Conversation

dominictb commented Jun 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

melvin-bot bot commented Jun 27, 2024

ishpaul777 commented Jul 2, 2024

ishpaul777 commented Jul 8, 2024 • edited Loading

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

ishpaul777 commented Jul 8, 2024

dominictb commented Jul 9, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 9, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 10, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 10, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 15, 2024

OSBotify commented Jul 17, 2024

dominictb commented Jun 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ishpaul777 commented Jul 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading