add display name replacement and make search page router editable #49838

289Adam289 · 2024-09-27T10:39:00Z

Details

follow up from #49462 (comment)
makes search page input editable
allows for using filters to and from with emails taxRate with names and cardID with bank name

Fixed Issues

$#49121
PROPOSAL:

Tests

Open Search Router on any page
Insert query with filters from, to, taxRate e.g. from:name.name@email.com
Verify that search works correctly

On wide screen:

Use search page input
Verify that it is editable and that search works
Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

QA Steps

Open Search Router on any page
Insert query with filters from, to, taxRate e.g. from:name.name@email.com
Verify that search works correctly

On wide screen:

Use search page input
Verify that it is editable and that search works
Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.10.33.33.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.10.37.13.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.10.26.37.mp4

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.10.40.58.mp4

289Adam289 · 2024-09-27T12:31:36Z

While working on this issue, I've stumbled upon two problems with the current Search implementation of filters: from, to, in, cardID, taxRate:

Search Router Input: We can replace emails, names, and bank names only with IDs that are stored in Onyx, hence the user is currently unable to search for expenses and messages that are not in Onyx. (At present, the API only supports IDs)
Saved Search: When a user saves a complex query and opens the app on another device, Onyx may not have all the necessary data to replace IDs with display names, leaving blank spaces in the SearchHeader.

Changing the API to support more than just IDs may be unavoidable, especially considering the first problem. It would also simplify frontend logic substantially by removing functions that replace IDs with names and vice-versa.
cc @Kicu @luacmartins

luacmartins · 2024-09-27T13:20:28Z

Agreed. I created an issue for it here and I'll work on it next week.

289Adam289 · 2024-10-02T16:57:09Z

@luacmartins The current implementations of advanced filters from, to, taxRate, cardID, and in all rely on IDs which enable the creation of more precise queries. Because of this, I doubt we can substitute them with names or emails. Consequently, the replacement of names in user-written queries becomes a necessity. Is that approach correct or should I look for solutions that are not using IDs?

How should we handle the case of the in filter? For instance, the #announce room is often repeated across different workspaces. Should we swap room names with IDs based on the currently selected workspace?

Moreover, how do we approach the situation where no workspace is selected through the workspace switcher?

luacmartins · 2024-10-02T20:24:20Z

I think this issue will be solved with autocomplete. I was working on the backend PR to allow emails/names but I ran into the same issue you described. I think allowing from/to to use emails is fine because those are unique. taxRate would also be ok because we'd just search for anything with for example 5% rate, but cardID and in are trickier because as you said, those are not unique, so I think we need to rely on autocomplete for those.

I think for now, we'll update from, to and taxRate to take in emails/value and leave cardID and in as is, until autocomplete is available.

Kicu · 2024-10-03T10:38:03Z

I think implementing from, to and taxRate first is a good idea 👍

@luacmartins can you expand a bit how would autocomplete help the rest of the cases? I understand that we can save the specific id somewhere in memory when a user picks it from autocomplete, but I don't think that solves everything.

Would we not allow user to type in just a string like in:#wave by hand? will we block it if he/she doesnt choose if there are multiple #wave rooms?

what about saved searches? we would have to save id in the search and not the text (like: #admins, #wave)
what about deeplinks that people might send to each other? it means we have to store id in the search query in URL

I think we should start thinking about these, because not having a single unique identifier (that is not id) for these fields is a bigger problem.

One interesting thing we found out yesterday while testing app.

You can only type in room mentions in the Composer if you are in a specific workspace (either selected by ws switcher or a workspace report). If you're in "All" room and normal chat - room mentions don't work.
I have no idea how related this might be to our case, but it's worth investigating a bit at least. Perhaps one can only search for a room in the context of policyID?

rec-room-mention.mp4

Kicu

Left some generic comments, I think you could spent a bit of time to simplify the component a bit, since Search is growing quite fast 😅

src/components/Search/SearchPageHeader.tsx

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts

melvin-bot · 2024-10-04T08:47:53Z

@rayane-djouah Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

luacmartins · 2024-10-04T14:29:48Z

@rayane-djouah let's prioritize this PR next since I think we should have this functionality in place before we enable the feature to all users.

rayane-djouah · 2024-10-04T14:53:19Z

Reviewer Checklist

I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
- I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
- I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
- I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
- I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
- Android: Native
- Android: mWeb Chrome
- iOS: Native
- iOS: mWeb Safari
- MacOS: Chrome / Safari
- MacOS: Desktop
If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
- I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
- I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
- I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
- I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
- I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
- I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
- I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
- I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
- I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
If a new component is created I verified that:
- A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
- All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
- The file is named correctly
- The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
- The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
- For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
- Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
- All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
- The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
If any new file was added I verified that:
- The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
- A similar style doesn't already exist
- The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
- I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
- I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Screen.Recording.2024-10-11.at.11.34.40.AM.mov

Android: mWeb Chrome

Screen.Recording.2024-10-11.at.11.31.15.AM.mov

iOS: Native

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-10-11.at.11.22.15.mp4

iOS: mWeb Safari

Simulator.Screen.Recording.-.iPhone.15.Pro.Max.-.2024-10-11.at.11.20.41.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

Screen.Recording.2024-10-11.at.11.16.40.AM.mov

MacOS: Desktop

Screen.Recording.2024-10-11.at.11.18.15.AM.mov

luacmartins

BUG: when changing status the header is updated with the search query

Perform a custom search
Change the status
Note that the header changes away from the Search bar and shows the query instead

Expected behavior: keep the search bar with the new status

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.9.53.16.AM.mov

luacmartins · 2024-10-04T16:01:25Z

Also, I'm not sure about this one, but we're changing the user input to either add things like type:expense status:all or rearrange the order of filters, in my example below test amount>200 to amount>200 test. It feels unexpected. I think we should keep user input as is and just normalize the query under the hood

Screen.Recording.2024-10-04.at.9.59.39.AM.mov

289Adam289 · 2024-10-04T16:14:47Z

When user enters the query we navigate to SearchPage with a different root. Then new input is generated using url making it the only source of truth. This is the reason why user input changes after submit. I can make following changes:

Remove `type:{type} status:{status}" from input.
I can try to keep the order of filters but it may require changing the grammar e.g. currently all keywords are filtered from the query and an extra tree with OR operators is created

luacmartins · 2024-10-04T16:18:16Z

@289Adam289 I don't think we need to tackle that in this PR. I realize that it'd involve bigger changes and we need to align on the expected behavior. Let's not block this PR on that or make changes now.

289Adam289 · 2024-10-04T16:20:34Z

Ok I will fix the first bug. Should I leave the type and status in the input?

luacmartins · 2024-10-04T16:21:58Z

Yea, I think we can do that for now as we think of a more holistic approach to not change the user input

rayane-djouah · 2024-10-07T14:09:40Z

Addressing #49838 (comment) in a follow up sounds good to me 👍
cc @luacmartins

289Adam289 · 2024-10-07T15:39:15Z

I added last search type to SearchContext so that search bar skeleton visibility depends on last type and not on ref in Search that resets on every navigation. @rayane-djouah could you take a look?
I will fix remaining filters tomorrow.

289Adam289 · 2024-10-09T11:21:42Z

That should be all

rayane-djouah

BUG:

Initiate a custom search with invalid filter values using the following query: type:exp status:al date<abcd date>abcd amount>abcd amount<abcd expenseType:abc,abcd currency:abcd from:abc,abcd to:abc,abcd category:abc,abcd tag:abc,abcdd taxRate:abc,abc in:abc,abcd
Click on the "Filters" button.
Observe that despite that no filters are visibly selected, yet the "Reset Filters" and the "Save search" buttons are availabe.
Click on the "view results" button
Notice that the app displays results for a subset of the previous query: type:exp status:al expenseType:abc,abcd from:abc,abcd to:abc,abcd taxRate:abc in:abc,abcd, these filter values are not valid and were not visibly selected on the filters page

Expected Behavior: The "Reset Filters" and the "Save search" buttons should only be visible if there are visibly active filters. Additionally, the app should not include invalid filters values when we click on the "view results" button.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-09.at.3.21.11.PM.mov

src/components/Search/SearchFiltersChatsSelector.tsx

src/pages/Search/SearchAdvancedFiltersPage/SearchFiltersExpenseTypePage.tsx

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts

rayane-djouah · 2024-10-10T21:47:23Z

Related to #49838 (comment):

The functions buildSearchQueryString and buildQueryStringFromFilterFormValues do not maintain the same order of filters.

For example, if we select a date and a currency from the filters page and view the results, we get type:expense status:all currency:USD date>2024-10-01. However, when we press "enter" in the input field, the order changes to type:expense status:all date>2024-10-01 currency:USD.

Screen.Recording.2024-10-10.at.10.44.31.PM.mov

I think we can either fix the buildSearchQueryString and buildQueryStringFromFilterFormValues functions to return the filters in the same order in this PR, or address it with the follow-up to fix #49838 (comment)

289Adam289 · 2024-10-11T07:05:02Z

Order changing of standard filters and order changing of keywords are caused by two different things but fixes may interact with each other. I think it would be better to handle both in a follow up pr.

rayane-djouah

LGTM and tests well

rayane-djouah · 2024-10-11T10:42:39Z

@luacmartins We're not handling tax names on the backend yet. If I have tax rates in Onyx and search for taxRate:"Tax Rate 1", I get results (because the name is replaced by id). However, after clearing the Onyx storage, I no longer get any results (because the name is sent to backend).

Screen.Recording.2024-10-11.at.11.27.04.AM.mov

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:04:30Z

@luacmartins We're not handling tax names on the backend yet.

Ah yea, we only handle the id or tax rate amount, e.g. 5%. I'm not sure if we can support the name, since we can't really differentiate the name from id. I guess we could search a tax by both, id and name whenever an input other than a rate is entered.

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:05:57Z

I added the follow up issues to this tracking issue for now #50250. Gonna create individual issues once the dust settles a bit :)

luacmartins

LGTM. Left a few comments but I think we can address them in a follow up.

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:22:35Z

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts

+                .filter((expenseType) => Object.values(CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE).includes(expenseType as ValueOf<typeof CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE>));
+        }
+        if (filterKey === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.CARD_ID) {
+            filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.map((card) => card.value.toString()).filter((card) => Object.keys(cardList).includes(card));


Same here and for the filters below

Suggested change

filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.map((card) => card.value.toString()).filter((card) => Object.keys(cardList).includes(card));

filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.map((card) => card.value.toString()).filter((card) => !!cardList[card]);

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:31:56Z

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts

+        if (filterKey === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.EXPENSE_TYPE) {
+            filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]
+                ?.map((expenseType) => expenseType.value.toString())
+                .filter((expenseType) => Object.values(CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE).includes(expenseType as ValueOf<typeof CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE>));
+        }


NAB we can optimize some of these validations

Suggested change

if (filterKey === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.EXPENSE_TYPE) {

filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]

?.map((expenseType) => expenseType.value.toString())

.filter((expenseType) => Object.values(CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE).includes(expenseType as ValueOf<typeof CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE>));

}

if (filterKey === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.EXPENSE_TYPE) {

const validExpenseTypes = new Set(Object.values(CONST.SEARCH.TRANSACTION_TYPE));

filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.filter((value) => value && validExpenseTypes.has(value));

}

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:43:25Z

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts

+    if (filterName === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.FROM || filterName === CONST.SEARCH.SYNTAX_FILTER_KEYS.TO) {
+        if (typeof filter === 'string') {
+            const email = filter;
+            return PersonalDetailsUtils.getPersonalDetailByEmail(email)?.accountID.toString() ?? filter;
+        }
+        const emails = filter;
+        return emails.map((email) => PersonalDetailsUtils.getPersonalDetailByEmail(email)?.accountID.toString() ?? email);
+    }


NAB the API can now handle emails directly, so we could remove this.

luacmartins · 2024-10-11T16:46:47Z

Added the follow up above to #50250

OSBotify · 2024-10-11T16:56:44Z

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

github-actions · 2024-10-15T03:30:05Z

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/luacmartins in version: 9.0.49-0 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

github-actions · 2024-10-17T01:45:00Z

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/marcaaron in version: 9.0.49-2 🚀

platform	result
🤖 android 🤖	success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥	success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎	success ✅
🕸 web 🕸	success ✅

add display name replacement

2dd0e87

luacmartins mentioned this pull request Sep 27, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-10-14] [Search v2.4] Update from, to, in, cardID, taxRate filters to accept names in addition to IDs #49846

Closed

Kicu mentioned this pull request Sep 30, 2024

Search-New SearchButton has not been added #49785

Closed

6 tasks

289Adam289 added 2 commits October 2, 2024 08:35

Merge branch 'main' into 289Adam289/49121-add-ids-search-router-input

2a61b10

make input editable and allow names

c2a1ddd

Kicu reviewed Oct 3, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/components/Search/SearchPageHeader.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/components/Search/SearchPageHeader.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

289Adam289 added 5 commits October 3, 2024 13:39

improve variable and function names

08e045d

improve HeaderWrapper

f23f637

Merge branch 'main' into 289Adam289/49121-add-ids-search-router-input

0a134c3

fix merge

0ef31fa

improve input for keywords

b8c7e0b

289Adam289 marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 08:47

289Adam289 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2024 08:47

melvin-bot bot requested review from rayane-djouah and removed request for a team October 4, 2024 08:47

luacmartins self-requested a review October 4, 2024 14:26

luacmartins requested changes Oct 4, 2024

View reviewed changes

fix search bar loading

7ca5af1

289Adam289 added 3 commits October 9, 2024 09:25

fix to, from filters and auto focus

ee430d1

Merge branch 'main' into 289Adam289/49121-add-ids-search-router-input

df7730f

fix currency, tag and category

25b729b

rayane-djouah suggested changes Oct 9, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/components/Search/SearchFiltersChatsSelector.tsx Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/pages/Search/SearchAdvancedFiltersPage/SearchFiltersExpenseTypePage.tsx Show resolved Hide resolved

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

289Adam289 added 2 commits October 10, 2024 18:35

add validation for all filters

ac64d25

Merge branch 'main' into 289Adam289/49121-add-ids-search-router-input

c43c246

rayane-djouah suggested changes Oct 10, 2024

View reviewed changes

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

src/libs/SearchUtils.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

fix display value

5201fce

289Adam289 mentioned this pull request Oct 11, 2024

[Search v2.4] Search Router Polish Issues #50250

Closed

11 tasks

rayane-djouah approved these changes Oct 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

melvin-bot bot requested a review from luacmartins October 11, 2024 10:40

luacmartins approved these changes Oct 11, 2024

View reviewed changes

luacmartins merged commit 2f1b6f1 into Expensify:main Oct 11, 2024
18 checks passed

github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2024

Deploy Checklist: New Expensify 2024-10-15 #50764

Closed

71 tasks

luacmartins mentioned this pull request Oct 15, 2024

[HOLD for payment 2024-10-24] [HOLD for payment 2024-10-10] [$250] [Search v2.4] [App] Update Search results page (Search bar only) #49121

Closed

rayane-djouah mentioned this pull request Oct 16, 2024

[No QA] Split SearchUtils into two files #50866

Merged

48 tasks

289Adam289 mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2024

search router polish #50883

Merged

50 tasks

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

add display name replacement and make search page router editable #49838

add display name replacement and make search page router editable #49838

289Adam289 commented Sep 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

289Adam289 commented Sep 27, 2024

luacmartins commented Sep 27, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 2, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 2, 2024

Kicu commented Oct 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Kicu left a comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024

rayane-djouah commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

luacmartins left a comment

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

289Adam289 commented Oct 4, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

289Adam289 commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024

rayane-djouah commented Oct 7, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 7, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 9, 2024

rayane-djouah left a comment •

edited

Loading

rayane-djouah commented Oct 10, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 11, 2024

rayane-djouah left a comment

rayane-djouah commented Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins left a comment

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Oct 11, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2024

	filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.map((card) => card.value.toString()).filter((card) => Object.keys(cardList).includes(card));
	filtersForm[filterKey] = filters[filterKey]?.map((card) => card.value.toString()).filter((card) => !!cardList[card]);

add display name replacement and make search page router editable #49838

add display name replacement and make search page router editable #49838

Conversation

289Adam289 commented Sep 27, 2024 • edited Loading

Details

Fixed Issues

Tests

Offline tests

QA Steps

PR Author Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

289Adam289 commented Sep 27, 2024

luacmartins commented Sep 27, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 2, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 2, 2024

Kicu commented Oct 3, 2024 • edited Loading

Kicu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 4, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024

rayane-djouah commented Oct 4, 2024 • edited Loading

Reviewer Checklist

Screenshots/Videos

luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 • edited Loading

289Adam289 commented Oct 4, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 • edited Loading

289Adam289 commented Oct 4, 2024 • edited Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024

rayane-djouah commented Oct 7, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 7, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 9, 2024

rayane-djouah left a comment • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rayane-djouah commented Oct 10, 2024

289Adam289 commented Oct 11, 2024

rayane-djouah left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

rayane-djouah commented Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024 • edited Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024

luacmartins left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luacmartins Oct 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024

OSBotify commented Oct 11, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 15, 2024

github-actions bot commented Oct 17, 2024

289Adam289 commented Sep 27, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Kicu commented Oct 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rayane-djouah commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

289Adam289 commented Oct 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rayane-djouah left a comment •

edited

Loading

luacmartins commented Oct 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading