Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix receipt disappears when dismissing distance editor after receipt is generated #51519

Conversation

wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor

@wildan-m wildan-m commented Oct 26, 2024

Details

This PR will fix receipt disappears when dismissing distance editor after receipt is generated

Fixed Issues

$ #48630
PROPOSAL: #48630 (comment)

Tests

Note

When using a local server, make sure to switch the BE to staging on the Troubleshooting page to access the GetRouteForBackup API, which is not yet available in dev.

There are known issues after this PR applied map and some other fields will be flickered for a brief moment
The issues arise due to discrepancies between the transactionBackup and transaction data during online updates. Additional BE changes are needed to address this. Related comment

  1. Open app
  2. Go to workspace chat.
  3. Go offline.
  4. Submit a distance expense.
  5. Go to transaction thread.
  6. Click Distance.
  7. Go online.
  8. After the receipt in the background is generated, dismiss the distance editor by clicking RHP back button.
  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

Same as test

QA Steps

Same as test

  • Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I verified the translation was requested/reviewed in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.16.04.29.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.16.28.52.mp4
iOS: Native
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.15.49.12.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.15.57.56.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.14.09.13.mp4
MacOS: Desktop
Kapture.2024-10-26.at.16.07.27.mp4

@wildan-m wildan-m requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2024 09:39
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from ikevin127 October 26, 2024 09:39
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 26, 2024

@ikevin127 Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that the left part of a conditional rendering a React component is a boolean and NOT a string, e.g. myBool && <MyComponent />.
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.js or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
android.webm
Android: mWeb Chrome
android-mweb.webm
iOS: Native
ios.mp4
iOS: mWeb Safari
ios-mweb.1.mp4
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
web.mov
MacOS: Desktop
desktop.mov

Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Besides these two things, the code looks good and I think once the requested changes are addressed we'll be good to Approve -> Merge.

}
let command;
switch (routeType) {
case 'draft':
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These 3 hardcoded switch / case strings can be replaced with the variables you added in CONST, like you did here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ikevin127 done

@@ -78,7 +79,18 @@ function IOURequestStepDistance({
},
[optimisticWaypoints, transaction],
);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wildan-m ⚠️ I noticed an issue which happens only when the RHP is dismissed for the first time -> the map component in the report resets / reloads. This doesn't happen if we open Distance RHP again and dismiss for the 2nd time.

issue.mov

I'm pretty sure that this will be reported as regression if we ship it this way, because since we fixed the issue in the sense that the map does show up now when dismissing the RHP, we now have that flicker map reset / reload on first time RHP dismissal.

Please look into this and see if you can figure out a way to not have the report map reset / reload when the RHP is dismissed for the first time and instead keep it the way it looks when it loads for the first time while RHP is still open if possible.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ikevin127 After further investigation, this issue related to my previous mentioned issue #48630 (comment) where transactionBackup is not exactly the same with unmodified transaction data.

For instance, in backup, the pendingFields is not removed, this will cause incorrect result here:

if (hasReceipt) {
receiptURIs = ReceiptUtils.getThumbnailAndImageURIs(updatedTransaction ?? transaction);
}

I think the only way to resolve that flicker issue and other fields flicker is to make the backup data exactly the same with unmodified transaction data when they are online, and it will require BE change.

@Gonals is it possible that when we call GetRouteForBackup we also get the same unmodified transaction data when they are online?

The missing fields can be seen in previous comment #48630 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@wildan-m Thanks for the investigation and explanation, I just wanted to point it out and ask @Gonals whether we should fix it now or in another issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@wildan-m wildan-m Oct 27, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found another issue where the generated map is not clickable due to pendingFields and pendingAction not being removed. Making transactionBackup identical to unmodified transaction when online is crucial to prevent flickering and an unclickable map, but I'm unsure if this is possible from the backend perspective.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this has a different root cause, right? Since it requires BE changes, I think it is a different bug

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this has a different root cause, right? Since it requires BE changes, I think it is a different bug

@Gonals I agree that flickering is not directly related to the original issue and fixing it is not straightforward.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

@wildan-m Please address the requested change in #51519 (comment), after which I will 🟢 Approve and defer to Gonals regarding issue mentioned in #51519 (comment) and whether or not we cah ship it like this and not get penalty in case it's reported as regression post-merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@ikevin127 ikevin127 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Note: Failing jest test seems unrelated (timeout).

⚠️ @Gonals Please check out this reported issue / discussion in #51519 (comment) before merging as we need your final decision on whether or not we can ship it in its current state and not get a penalty in case the issue will be reported as regression post-merge.

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from Gonals October 30, 2024 04:16
@wildan-m
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ikevin127 please check this commit 198ccb3 That change will resolve map not clickable issue.

@ikevin127
Copy link
Contributor

ikevin127 commented Oct 30, 2024

@wildan-m Thanks for that additional fix, looks good to me! 🚀 Approved once again, and now passing it to @Gonals for final review.

Caution

Please consider issue mentioned in #51519 (comment) and whether or not we cah ship it like this and not get a regression penalty in case it will be reported as regression post-merge.

@Gonals Gonals merged commit d032ddf into Expensify:main Oct 31, 2024
18 of 19 checks passed
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot added the Emergency label Oct 31, 2024
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Oct 31, 2024

@Gonals looks like this was merged without a test passing. Please add a note explaining why this was done and remove the Emergency label if this is not an emergency.

@Gonals Gonals removed the Emergency label Oct 31, 2024
@Gonals
Copy link
Contributor

Gonals commented Oct 31, 2024

No emergency. The linter was complaining about files that were not modified using withOnyx

@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

Copy link
Contributor

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/Gonals in version: 9.0.56-0 🚀

platform result
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖🔄 android HybridApp 🤖🔄 success ✅
🍎🔄 iOS HybridApp 🍎🔄 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants