-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 104
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Maybe a seeking error after 2.40 #394
Comments
regression introduced by 13d9f. |
I think the new soft reset behavior is fairly safe: tested random seeking on mpeg2, avc and hevc files. And the user can always switch it off if the new reset behavior turns out to be problematic. Also tested the case in FFMS/ffms2#394 and confirmed that lsmas is still unaffected. Fixes #10. Signed-off-by: akarin <i@akarin.info>
Can you be a bit more specific on what types of files this affects? You've only said "a video" - and it definitely isnt all videos, (not e.g. MP4 AFAICT). Is it specific to Matroska? H.264 in Matroska? Blu-ray H.264 in Matroska? |
Also can you test with master, particularily after: 5da8f49 |
It is not specific to Matroska. In fact, I originally spot this with several Blu-ray m2ts files. The sample mkv file is actually a m2ts remux. |
It should affect all avc video files.
The latest master branch (rev 9525fcd) also exhibits this issue.
I wrote a script to test ffms2 against lsmas.
https://github.com/AkarinVS/weird-scripts/blob/master/ffms2/issue394.vpy
|
It definitely does not affect all AVC files, at least not via the C API - I've had petabytes of videos run via that + tests (albeit almost totally only MP4s) running though it since that commit when in. I've not tested via the VS plugin, though. I have a few possible suspicions:
I am leaning towards the third possibility, since I would have expected this to come up sooner in the previous 3 years since that commit, otherwise. That also means it will be a giant headache to debug... I will check into it this week - any further info is of course welcome 🙂 . |
I definitely suspect an FFmpeg behavior change, then. |
I built the ffmpeg release 3.3.7 (commit
93e2cb4511417d265f3644c122167678fe4d3161, dated Apr 13 2018, which is about
the same time frame as ffms2 rev 13d9f01)
After fixing building ffms2 rev 13d9f01
with that ffmpeg version, I can reproduce the issue as well (using
seek-test.mkv as in this issue).
(And the previous revision doesn't exhibit the issue. In fact, I can
compare these two ffms2 releases, and confirm the off-by-1 seeking as well.
As both versions are built with the same ffmpeg revision, this should
completely rule out the possibility of a regression in ffmpeg)
Please note that regular testing won't catch this kind of seeking issues.
To catch it, a dedicated test must be created:
(option 1) first sequentially hashes each frame and then randomly seeks and
compares frame hashes; or
(option 2) compare against another frame-accurate source (lsmas probably
isn't ready yet in 2018)
Because when ffms2 gives wrong frames after random seeking, it's usually a
frame off-by-one, so it's fairly easy to miss.
I think this could help explaining why it hasn't been noticed till now.
The fact that there are no official releases between 2016 and 2020 might
also play a part in this.
|
Workarounds FFMS#394. Signed-off-by: akarin <i@akarin.info>
Option 1 is how the tests I generally run are generated, interestingly enough. Also, thanks for clarifying it is off-by-one, and testing. I'll try and dig into this. |
You can try this build. I have no issues with it. Here quick test between the different version. It would be great if the latest upstream builds fix the regressions. |
@TbtBI that is interesting, since that is a very recent build - long after the supposed source of seeking issues... I notice the fork of ffmpeg used in that build has: HomeOfAviSynthPlusEvolution/FFmpeg@95dfde1 |
There are included patches too in the link of that build. It seems reverted back some commits: |
Some of those contain revert, but that big diff contains a bunch of changes that seem to come form nowhere, without context? That's... kind of a mess. |
I think this should fix it - if anyone of @vxzms @misakikasumi @AkarinVS can test it on problematic files. diff --git a/src/core/videosource.cpp b/src/core/videosource.cpp
index 006099e..f838380 100644
--- a/src/core/videosource.cpp
+++ b/src/core/videosource.cpp
@@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ bool FFMS_VideoSource::DecodePacket(AVPacket *Packet) {
// H.264 (PAFF) and HEVC can have one field per packet, and decoding delay needs
// to be adjusted accordingly.
if (CodecContext->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_H264 || CodecContext->codec_id == AV_CODEC_ID_HEVC) {
- if (!PAFFAdjusted && DelayCounter > Delay && LastDecodedFrame->repeat_pict == 0 && Ret != 0) {
+ if (!PAFFAdjusted && DelayCounter > Delay && LastDecodedFrame->interlaced_frame == 1 && LastDecodedFrame->repeat_pict == 0 && Ret != 0) {
int OldBFrameDelay = Delay - (CodecContext->thread_count - 1);
Delay = 1 + OldBFrameDelay * 2 + (CodecContext->thread_count - 1); Also, do you happen to have any files you know hit this bug that are less copyrighted? I want to add a unit test, but |
Sorry, it’s my mistake, I used the wrong repo to create the wrong binary. FFSM2 mater branch can reproduce the error, I test your diff, it works fine on my test video. But I get error when test https://samples.mplayerhq.hu/MPEG-4/MPEGSolution_stuart.mp4. |
Gosh… Everyone builds his own ffmpeg… Totally messed up… 😿 |
I also experienced this issue (and know many other people who did), especially with hevc videos encoded with open-gop=1. I tested at least 3 different videos that are showing this bug on the current master, and the proposed change fixed it for all of them.
I made a test video out of Big Buck Bunny 3D, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. The subtitle file has different lines synchronized with all the video cuts. In my case (using ffms2 from Aegisub - specifically this fork, with a custom ffms2 subproject), seeking to the end of Line 3 already shows the third frame of the following shot, instead of the last frame of the current shot. Many later lines behave similarly. The proposed patch fixes all of them. So, is there a chance of getting this fix committed to master? |
OK, I'll look into doing that this week. |
…erlaced Otherwise seeking can be jank in certain types of streams like open GOP HEVC or MP4s with huge edit list trims a the very start. Fixe FFMS#394. Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
…erlaced Otherwise seeking can be jank in certain types of streams like open GOP HEVC or MP4s with huge edit list trims a the very start. Fixe #394. Signed-off-by: Derek Buitenhuis <derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com>
This is to include the fix for FFMS/ffms2#394 .
This is to include the fix for FFMS/ffms2#394 .
This is to include the fix for FFMS/ffms2#394 .
This is to include the fix for FFMS/ffms2#394 .
@misakikasumi get a seeking error when using ffms2_api4, I also reproduced this problem in
2.40
,2.23.1
looks fine.When seeking a video, there is a high probability that the wrong frame will be returned in test.
The test environment is Windows + Vapoursynth / Aegisub + ffms2 / lsmashsource. Here is the test (sample video link):
vspipe dump_y4m.vpy seek-test.y4m
dump_y4m.vpy:
core.ffms2.Source("seek-test.mkv").set_output()
a.
core.ffms2.Source("seek-test.mkv")
b.
core.lsmas.LWLibavSource("seek-test.mkv")
c.
core.ffms2.Source("seek-test.y4m")
d.
core.lsmas.LWLibavSource("seek-test.y4m")
e. Aegisub open
seek-test.mkv
use the same ffms2 version as VSIn the test, a and e results are always the same.
outputs of b, c and d are always the same.
a and c are likely to be different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: