-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
some more coverity fixups #6248
Conversation
Coverity is complaining that we are looking beyond the end of the pointer. Why not just use prefix_cmp here? Since we are comparing to route_nodes. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
It is possible that area is null, let's ensure it isn't. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Coverity does not understand how our CLI works. Make it happy that we have tested it's existence Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
It is possible that a if_lookup_by_index can return NULL ensure that we handle this appropriately. Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-11923/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. Warnings Generated during build:Debian 10 amd64 build: Successful with additional warningsDebian Package lintian failed for Debian 10 amd64 build:
|
See individual commits but just taking another swipe at some coverity issues found