-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
7da1b44
commit a054585
Showing
3 changed files
with
103 additions
and
6 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
a054585
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, @cowtowncoder. Can we expect this fix to be released soon?
a054585
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have plans for releasing 2.6 patches.
But if there was someone within community who'd like to become owner/maintainer for older, closed branches, there is a possibility. At this point I do not have time to do that work unfortunately, so if there is need for such version this should be discussed on
jackson-dev
. If so, maintainer could merge important fixes; as is, 2.6 is probably missing many.a054585
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your response, @cowtowncoder. I thought that you mentioned that you intended to release it.
I can't become that owner, unfortunately.
a054585
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No problem: it's a big undertaking and so I did not mean to imply I'd expect you to do it -- was more thinking of maybe someone working for, say, AWS, were baseline dependency is to 2.6.7.
My comment suggested I would be open to micro-patch if there is strong demand. But I usually try to first suggest upgrade. For example:
https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson/wiki/Jackson-Release-2.7
points to 2.7.9.3 as version with the fix (and for 2.8, 2.8.11 I think).
But if nothing else is practical, I am willing to make one-off releases. In this case there is just this one fix as far as I can see, so I'd prefer not to make more releases.
a054585
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I asked AWS to consider this in aws/aws-sdk-java#1597.