Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move to CUDA.jl #1258

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jul 2, 2020
Merged

move to CUDA.jl #1258

merged 18 commits into from
Jul 2, 2020

Conversation

CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member

continuing #1204

@CarloLucibello CarloLucibello changed the title Dg/cudabump move to CUDA.jl Jul 2, 2020
@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
1258: move to CUDA.jl r=CarloLucibello a=CarloLucibello

continuing #1204 

Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <dhairya@juliacopmuting.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <dhairya@juliacomputing.com>
Co-authored-by: CarloLucibello <carlo.lucibello@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 2, 2020

Build failed:

@DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member

DhairyaLGandhi commented Jul 2, 2020

I would recommend pushing to that branch directly rather than have multiple prs do the same thing. I can give you commit bit on that

@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
1258: move to CUDA.jl r=CarloLucibello a=CarloLucibello

continuing #1204 

Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <dhairya@juliacopmuting.com>
Co-authored-by: Dhairya Gandhi <dhairya@juliacomputing.com>
Co-authored-by: CarloLucibello <carlo.lucibello@gmail.com>
@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member Author

I would recommend pushing to that branch directly rather than have multiple prs do the same thing. I can give you commit bit on that

yeah, I wasn't sure how to do that since that branch is on your personal fork. This is on the original repo, so you should already be able to push to it

@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member Author

@maleadt I observe

julia> using Flux
┌ Warning: `haskey(::TargetIterator, name::String)` is deprecated, use `Target(; name = name) !== nothing` instead.
│   caller = llvm_compat(::VersionNumber) at compatibility.jl:181
└ @ CUDA ~/.julia/packages/CUDA/42B9G/deps/compatibility.jl:181

here. If using CUDA instead, no warning appears. Any clue?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 2, 2020

Build failed:

@CarloLucibello
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

@DhairyaLGandhi
Copy link
Member

Why remove the doctest?

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Jul 2, 2020

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 96943ea into master Jul 2, 2020
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2020
1261: reinstate curnn test r=CarloLucibello a=CarloLucibello

this is passing locally on my GPU, but in #1258 bors didn't seem to like it. Let's try again 

EDIT: actually this is not passing test locally, but let's see what BORS says in any case
cfr #1262 

Co-authored-by: CarloLucibello <carlo.lucibello@gmail.com>
bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 16, 2020
1261: reinstate curnn test r=DhairyaLGandhi a=CarloLucibello

this is passing locally on my GPU, but in #1258 bors didn't seem to like it. Let's try again 

EDIT: actually this is not passing test locally, but let's see what BORS says in any case
cfr #1262 

Co-authored-by: CarloLucibello <carlo.lucibello@gmail.com>
@CarloLucibello CarloLucibello deleted the dg/cudabump branch January 7, 2021 08:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants