-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add depthwise_conv* overloads for CUDA #22
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
function depthwise_conv!(y::DenseCuArray{T}, x::DenseCuArray{T}, w::DenseCuArray{T}, cdims::DepthwiseConvDims; | ||
alpha = 1, beta = 0, algo = -1) where T <: CUDNNFloat | ||
conv!(y, x, w, cims; alpha, beta, algo) | ||
end | ||
|
||
function ∇depthwise_conv_filter!(dw::DenseCuArray{T}, x::DenseCuArray{T}, dy::DenseCuArray{T}, | ||
cdims::ConvDims; alpha = 1, beta = 0, algo = -1) where T <: CUDNNFloat | ||
∇conv_filter!(dw, x, dy, cdims; alpha, beta, algo) | ||
end | ||
|
||
function ∇depthwise_conv_data!(dx::DenseCuArray{T}, dy::DenseCuArray{T}, w::DenseCuArray{T}, | ||
cdims::ConvDims; alpha = 1, beta = 0, algo = -1) where T <: CUDNNFloat | ||
∇conv_data!(dx, dy, w, cdims; alpha, beta, algo) | ||
end |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
these don't have to be cuda specific, we can add them to NNlib and remove the specific implementations (after a performance comparison)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add what to nnlib, sorry? This package is specific to GPU functionality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exactly these methods, with AbstractArray
arguments, i.e. fallback on conv
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Umm, we probably want to retain the cpu kernels anyway. Without explicitly having and launching Julia with many threads, grouped convolutions would scale with the number of groups.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this would be true for any implementation, specialized or not
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
julia> x′ = rand(Float32, 28, 28, 4, 2);
julia> w′ = rand(Float32, 3, 3, 4, 30);
julia> cdims = DenseConvDims(x′, w′, groups = 4)
julia> @btime conv($x′, $w′, $cdims);
362.792 μs (86 allocations: 736.36 KiB) # -t1
236.368 μs (94 allocations: 831.89 KiB) # -t2
232.137 μs (94 allocations: 831.89 KiB) # -t4
julia> @btime depthwiseconv($x′, $(permutedims(w′, (1,2,4,3))));
348.914 μs (42 allocations: 731.03 KiB) # -t1
156.558 μs (47 allocations: 826.53 KiB) # -t2
161.059 μs (47 allocations: 826.53 KiB) # -t4
This is with https://github.com/DhairyaLGandhi/NNlib.jl#dg/g2 which has a couple of fixes pending a PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks reasonable to me, just needs a couple tests in https://github.com/FluxML/NNlibCUDA.jl/blob/master/test/conv.jl (I know the implementation is technically covered indirectly now, but there's no guarantee these methods will forward to the conv ones forever).
No description provided.