Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of default analyzer #2720

Open
qdnguyen0 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of default analyzer #2720

qdnguyen0 opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@qdnguyen0
Copy link
Contributor

auto complete matching should use the index analyzer to understand stop words and CJK, in order to return the right number of tokens
qdnguyen0 added a commit to qdnguyen0/fdb-record-layer that referenced this issue May 14, 2024
@qdnguyen0
Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of defa…
3b30861 
…ult analyzer FoundationDB#2720
qdnguyen0 added a commit to qdnguyen0/fdb-record-layer that referenced this issue May 14, 2024
@qdnguyen0
Properly handle autocompletion with CJK using CJKUnigram filter Found…
dd00bff 
…ationDB#2712

Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of default analyzer FoundationDB#2720
qdnguyen0 added a commit to qdnguyen0/fdb-record-layer that referenced this issue May 16, 2024
@qdnguyen0
Properly handle autocompletion with CJK using CJKUnigram filter Found…
c32679d 
…ationDB#2712

Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of default analyzer FoundationDB#2720
MMcM pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 17, 2024
@qdnguyen0
Properly handle autocompletion with CJK using CJKUnigram filter #2712 (…
7fcbe23 
…#2713)

Auto complete matching need to use the index analyzer instead of default analyzer #2720
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@qdnguyen0