Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reintroduce inputBools with tighter definition #2

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jacky720
Copy link

@Jacky720 Jacky720 commented Mar 4, 2024

Seems like that's a much tighter bound on the array being compared here. Also, add a few floats I stumbled on (and name field_E80 and field_E84, we don't need to be cryptic with addresses on purpose).

int field_E60;
int field_E64;
int field_E68;
int inputBools[25];
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we do member prefix like m_variablename

int field_E6C;
int field_E70;
int field_E74;
int field_E78;
int field_E7C;
float field_E80;
float field_E84;
float heavy_attack_count_up;
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

same as comment in inputBools but should be like m_fVariableName and probably without _

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants