Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: include Transaction events in topic0 filter for download_logs #1980

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

DefiCake
Copy link
Member

@DefiCake DefiCake commented Jun 17, 2024

Closes #1979

[Short description of the changes.]

Checklist

  • Breaking changes are clearly marked as such in the PR description and changelog
  • New behavior is reflected in tests
  • The specification matches the implemented behavior (link update PR if changes are needed)

Before requesting review

  • I have reviewed the code myself
  • I have created follow-up issues caused by this PR and linked them here

@DefiCake DefiCake force-pushed the deficake/1979-download-logs-fti branch from 8d25555 to 6f4fe77 Compare June 17, 2024 19:16
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](http://semver.org/).

## [Unreleased]

- [#1980](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/pull/1980): Add `Transaction` to relayer 's event filter
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does L1 testnet/devnet contracts support FTI already? If yes, then we need additional code to handle this problem=)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, the current contract deployments do not support FTI.

I am currently developing it and the integration tests fail because this code is missing.

I thought FTI was already supported by fuel-core? In fact, after doing these changes, I have been able to trigger transactions through the relayer, locally.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we thought that we implemented everything=D But it seems we forgot to update the request to Ethereum RPC)))

Okay, if any network has no support for FTI, then we don't need any additional code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Relayer 's download_logs does not pick up Transaction events for FTI
3 participants