-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: better typegen contract factory integration with launchTestNode
#3398
feat: better typegen contract factory integration with launchTestNode
#3398
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
1 Skipped Deployment
|
…-node-contract-factory-integration
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #3398 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
db16ebc
to
8f61ca9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work on this @nedsalk , it will be a huge refactor to propagate these changes across the repo so that can be in a follow up PR
Coverage Report:
Changed Files:
|
…e` (#3398) * feat: better typegen contract factory integration with `launchTestNode` * give name to type * remove type assertion to improve inference * update docs to new approach * changeset * revert unnecessary change * rerun workflows * revert change * give name to intermediary type --------- Co-authored-by: Chad Nehemiah <chad.nehemiah94@gmail.com>
launchTestNode
integration withtypegen
contract factories #2708In this release, we:
launchTestNode
and typegen'd contract factories integrationSummary
With this PR we can now pass in the typegen'd contract factory directly instead of having to wrap it in a
{ factory: TypegendContractFactory }
object.Checklist