feat: add new transaction of Mint type

[LuizAsFight]

Add new Mint transaction

• decoders/encoders
• fix TransactionResponse to work with few props (no receipts, gas, etc..)
• specify better typing in TransactionRequest, as we don't need/should to use Mint transactions in there
• add better typing for Transaction, to improve usage when consuming TransactionResponse / TransactionResult in frontend side
  • now a Transaction will have all possible parameters as optional.
  • Transaction<TransactionType.Script> will have the exact params for Script transaction only
  • Transaction<TransactionType.Create> will have the exact params for Create transaction only
  • Transaction<TransactionType.Mint> will have the exact params for Mint transaction only

Closes #603
Closes #602

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟢	Statements	90.66% (+0.05% 🔼)	3699/4080
🟡	Branches	72.5% (+0.01% 🔼)	717/989
🟢	Functions	87.5% (+0.04% 🔼)	735/840
🟢	Lines	90.71% (+0.05% 🔼)	3546/3909

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / transaction-response.ts	82.5%	54.55% (-1.01% 🔻)	100%	82.5%

Test suite run success

549 tests passing in 49 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 38ecb79

[QuinnLee]

Could you elaborate on why this was removed? I think we can do TransactionScript | TransactionCreate | TransactionMint, but I may be missing something

[LuizAsFight]

it wasn't removed, it's just ahead in the code

[LuizAsFight]

TransactionScript | TransactionCreate | TransactionMint was the initial idea, but then it breaks a lot of things and significantly makes transaction response usage worst because of small number of common properties.

then I did a refactor on typing stuff for Transaction which now(optionally) accepts a generic informing transaction type

[LuizAsFight]

@QuinnLee you can check the changed tests/files to understand better how it's working now