Adds function return type unification. #6490
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The function return type unification was missing, leading to generic functions not being resolved based on the return type.
esdrubal
added
bug
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #6490 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
xunilrj
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
IGI-111
approved these changes
Sep 4, 2024
8 tasks
IGI-111
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
## Description This PR improves tests for #6490. Now we have one contract test where the contract address comes from a complex expression. ## Checklist - [x] I have linked to any relevant issues. - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book). - [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have [requested support from the DevRel team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose) - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [ ] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary `Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant. - [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md). - [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
8 tasks
ironcev
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2024
## Description This PR adds tests that prove that #6379 is fixed. The actual fix happened in #6490. Closes #6379. ## Checklist - [x] I have linked to any relevant issues. - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book). - [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have [requested support from the DevRel team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose) - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [ ] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary `Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant. - [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md). - [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers.
8 tasks
esdrubal
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2024
## Description This PR adds a test that proves implicit trait constraint already returns an error. The method dummy ICE reported in #6377 was fixed by #6490. Closes #6377. ## Checklist - [x] I have linked to any relevant issues. - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas. - [ ] I have updated the documentation where relevant (API docs, the reference, and the Sway book). - [ ] If my change requires substantial documentation changes, I have [requested support from the DevRel team](https://github.com/FuelLabs/devrel-requests/issues/new/choose) - [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works. - [x] I have added (or requested a maintainer to add) the necessary `Breaking*` or `New Feature` labels where relevant. - [x] I have done my best to ensure that my PR adheres to [the Fuel Labs Code Review Standards](https://github.com/FuelLabs/rfcs/blob/master/text/code-standards/external-contributors.md). - [x] I have requested a review from the relevant team or maintainers. Co-authored-by: Sophie Dankel <47993817+sdankel@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Joshua Batty <joshpbatty@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
The function return type unification was missing, leading to generic functions not being resolved based on the return type.
Checklist
Breaking*orNew Featurelabels where relevant.