Moved to extract_answer from #148 and back to gpt-4o-mini
#161
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:XXL
jamesbraza
commented
Dec 18, 2024
| eval_prompt = self.EVALUATION_PROMPT_TEMPLATE.format( | ||
| qa_prompt=self.question_prompt, qa_answer=answer | ||
| ) | ||
| raw_evaluation = await prompt_runner(eval_prompt) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Also thanks to this change we no longer need raw_evaluation
jamesbraza
force-pushed
the
better-mc-grading
branch
from
dbbe80f to
90dbcf4
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I incorporated #148 evaluation scheme into #157. @whitead 's prompting scheme was much better, so now we can move back to
gpt-4o-minifor evaluation.