Updates for ifx support #300
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mathomp4
added
the
0 diff
|
I included your feature-mathomp4-299-add-ifx-support into the hpc-stack build system and did a targeted build of esma_cmake. Doesn't look like esma_cmake compiles anything and I don't know what else in hpc-stack depends on it. Thus I'm not sure how to test this feature branch. |
tclune
approved these changes
Jan 2, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #299
Per @dkokron in #299,
ifxdoes not support-fp-model sourceand per Intel's docs it doesn't support-fp-model consistent. So this PR adds anIntelLLVM_Fortran.cmakefile that is just a copy ofIntel_LLVM.cmakewith these options blanked.I commented out the old flags because, well, those two flags are sort of important for GEOS chip-change reproducibility and I hope they come back...