Implement "Relevant Keywords" Feature for Premium Members #989
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Mohitranag18
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
RateMyResume.js (2)
111-116: Improve clipboard operation feedback and browser compatibility.The current implementation could be enhanced with better user feedback and fallback mechanisms.
Consider these improvements:
-function copyKeywords() { - const keywordText = document.getElementById("keyword-text").innerText; - navigator.clipboard.writeText(keywordText) - .then(() => alert("Keywords copied to clipboard!")) - .catch(err => console.error("Failed to copy keywords:", err)); -} +async function copyKeywords() { + const copyButton = document.querySelector('#keyword-suggestions button'); + const keywordText = document.getElementById("keyword-text")?.innerText; + + if (!keywordText) return; + + // Visual feedback - start + copyButton.disabled = true; + copyButton.textContent = 'Copying...'; + + try { + if (navigator.clipboard) { + await navigator.clipboard.writeText(keywordText); + + // Success feedback + copyButton.textContent = '✓ Copied!'; + setTimeout(() => { + copyButton.textContent = 'Copy'; + copyButton.disabled = false; + }, 2000); + } else { + // Fallback for browsers without clipboard API + const textarea = document.createElement('textarea'); + textarea.value = keywordText; + document.body.appendChild(textarea); + textarea.select(); + document.execCommand('copy'); + document.body.removeChild(textarea); + + copyButton.textContent = '✓ Copied!'; + setTimeout(() => { + copyButton.textContent = 'Copy'; + copyButton.disabled = false; + }, 2000); + } + } catch (err) { + console.error("Failed to copy keywords:", err); + copyButton.textContent = '✗ Failed to copy'; + setTimeout(() => { + copyButton.textContent = 'Copy'; + copyButton.disabled = false; + }, 2000); + } +}
81-116: Align implementation with PR objectives.The current implementation has several gaps when compared to the PR objectives:
- Premium member validation relies on skill coins instead of proper membership status checks
- The keyword suggestion system uses static data instead of the planned API integration
- User data collection is limited to job roles, missing other planned data points like skills and industry
Consider these architectural improvements:
- Implement proper user session management for premium status
- Add the planned API integration with fallback to static data
- Expand user data collection to include skills and industry for better keyword targeting
- Add analytics tracking to measure feature usage and effectiveness
Would you like me to provide detailed implementation suggestions for any of these improvements?
RateMyResume.css (3)
248-258: Consider using min-height for better responsiveness.The fixed height of 80vh might cause content overflow on smaller screens or when the content exceeds the viewport height.
.panel2 { width: 100%; - height: 80vh; + min-height: 80vh; position: relative; display: flex; flex-direction: column; justify-content: center; align-items: center; margin-top: 7rem; }
286-302: Enhance layout flexibility and accessibility.The fixed dimensions might not accommodate varying content lengths and screen sizes effectively.
.keywordbox { - width: 90%; + width: min(90%, 1200px); height: 100%; position: relative; border-radius: 3rem; - border: 2px solid white; + border: 2px solid #fff; display: flex; flex-direction: column; + margin: 0 auto; } .mainbox { width: 100%; - height: 60%; + min-height: 60%; display: flex; - padding: 5rem; + padding: clamp(2rem, 5vw, 5rem); position: relative; justify-content: space-between; + flex-wrap: wrap; + gap: 2rem; }
341-356: Improve button styling consistency and interactivity.The button styles use generic colors and lack proper interactive states.
#keyword-suggestions button { - background-color: blue; + background-color: #003d4d; font-size: 1.7rem; width: auto; + transition: all 0.3s ease; + padding: 0.8rem 1.6rem; +} + +#keyword-suggestions button:hover, +#keyword-suggestions button:focus { + background-color: #002a36; + transform: translateY(-2px); + box-shadow: 0 4px 6px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); }RateMyResume.html (1)
153-154: Add ARIA landmarks for better accessibility.The panel structure is well-organized, but could benefit from improved accessibility.
- <!-- panel 2 start --> - <div class="panel2"> + <!-- panel 2 start --> + <div class="panel2" role="region" aria-label="Resume Keywords">Also applies to: 179-181
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
RateMyResume.css(3 hunks)RateMyResume.html(1 hunks)RateMyResume.js(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
RateMyResume.css (1)
33-33: LGTM: Color changes improve visual consistency.
The consistent use of teal (#003d4d) for text elements enhances the visual hierarchy and brand consistency.
Also applies to: 39-39, 48-48
RateMyResume.html (1)
154-179: Verify premium access restriction implementation.
The HTML structure supports the feature requirements, but we should verify the premium access restriction implementation in the JavaScript code.
✅ Verification successful
Premium access restriction is properly implemented
The JavaScript code correctly implements the premium access restriction for the keyword feature:
- Checks if user has sufficient SkillCoins (5) before showing keywords
- Deducts coins after successful keyword retrieval
- Shows alert when insufficient coins
- Updates coin display after transactions
- Allows earning coins by rating resumes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for premium access check implementation
rg -A 5 "premium.*check|access.*restrict|skillcoins" --type js
Length of output: 1338
Fixes
Fixes #929:
This PR addresses and implements the "Relevant Keywords" feature, exclusively available for premium members, to help them enhance their resumes with tailored keyword suggestions based on their specific information.
Description
This feature is designed to assist premium users in optimizing their resumes by providing targeted keyword recommendations relevant to their job roles, skills, and industry.
Feature Highlights
User Data Collection
Keyword Recommendation Logic
Premium Access Restriction
Screenshots
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Visual Enhancements
User Interaction