Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/protocol array field #320

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged

Feat/protocol array field #320

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023

Conversation

boscocg
Copy link
Contributor

@boscocg boscocg commented Feb 3, 2023

[PR Name]

Type of PR

  • [] - feature
  • [] - bugfix
  • [] - chore
  • [] - docs

Description

Lorem Ipsum

Checklist

  • [] - Provided useful description for this PR
  • [] - Provided the root cause of this bugfix
  • [] - Tested on supported devices

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 3, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated
gateway-website ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add your feedback Feb 3, 2023 at 5:19PM (UTC)
1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated
ui-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 3, 2023 at 5:19PM (UTC)

control,
} = useFormContext();

const { fields, append, remove, update } = useFieldArray({
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.

@codeclimate
Copy link

codeclimate bot commented Feb 3, 2023

Code Climate has analyzed commit baf0652 and detected 2 issues on this pull request.

Here's the issue category breakdown:

Category Count
Duplication 2

View more on Code Climate.

@boscocg boscocg merged commit 349e997 into develop Feb 3, 2023
@boscocg boscocg deleted the feat/protocol-array-field branch February 3, 2023 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants