Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reduced run time on ML with ODC notebook #1243

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024
Merged

Reduced run time on ML with ODC notebook #1243

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

erialC-P
Copy link
Collaborator

Proposed changes

This notebook is unchanged except for a down-sampling of the input training data polygons by 50 % to improve the notebook run time by the same amount.

Checklist

(Replace [ ] with [x] to check off)

  • [x ] Notebook created using the DEA-notebooks template
  • Remove any unused Python packages from Load packages
  • [x ] Remove any unused/empty code cells
  • [x ] Remove any guidance cells (e.g. General advice)
  • [ x] Ensure that all code cells follow the PEP8 standard for code. The jupyterlab_code_formatter tool can be used to format code cells to a consistent style: select each code cell, then click Edit and then one of the Apply X Formatter options (YAPF or Black are recommended).
  • [x ] Include relevant tags in the final notebook cell (refer to the DEA Tags Index, and re-use tags if possible)
  • [x ] Clear all outputs, run notebook from start to finish, and save the notebook in the state where all cells have been sequentially evaluated
  • Test notebook on both the NCI and DEA Sandbox (flag if not working as part of PR and ask for help to solve if needed)
  • If applicable, update the Notebook currently compatible with the NCI|DEA Sandbox environment only line below the notebook title to reflect the environments the notebook is compatible with
  • [x ] Check for any spelling mistakes using the DEA Sandbox's built-in spellchecker (double click on markdown cells then right-click on pink highlighted words). For example:

sandbox_spellchecker

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

Copy link
Collaborator

@BexDunn BexDunn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok to me :) Not super familiar with the underlying notebook, but looks faster and as if it still does things :)

Copy link
Collaborator

@BexDunn BexDunn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, meant to review this last time instead of just commenting

Copy link
Member

@robbibt robbibt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome!

@robbibt robbibt merged commit 358842a into develop Jul 15, 2024
1 check passed
@robbibt robbibt deleted the ML_with_ODC branch July 15, 2024 03:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants