ALM Field Item Refresh #4030
ALM Field Item Refresh #4030
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
Ginger/Ginger/ALM/ALMItemsFieldsConfigurationPage.xaml.cs (3)
83-90: LGTM! Good addition of connection verification.The connection verification before running the worker is a good defensive programming practice that prevents unnecessary background work and provides better user feedback.
Consider improving the error message handling.
The error message could be enhanced in the following ways:
- Use localized message key instead of hardcoded string
- Provide more specific guidance about where to check the settings
Consider this improvement:
- Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticInfoMessage, "Error in Connection to ALM, Please check ALM Connection Settings"); + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.ALMConnectionError, "Failed to connect to ALM. Please verify your connection settings in ALM > Configuration.");
Line range hint
156-167: Fix potential thread safety issues in BackgroundWorker implementation.The current implementation has several issues:
- Event handlers are subscribed every time
RunWorkeris called, potentially leading to duplicate handlers- The loader visibility management is incorrect (showing and immediately hiding)
Consider this safer implementation:
- public void RunWorker(Boolean refreshFlag) - { - this.ShowLoader(); - fieldsWorker.WorkerReportsProgress = true; - fieldsWorker.DoWork += new DoWorkEventHandler(fieldsWorker_DoWork); - fieldsWorker.ProgressChanged += new ProgressChangedEventHandler(FieldsWorker_ProgressChanged); - fieldsWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += new RunWorkerCompletedEventHandler(fieldsWorker_Completed); - - LoadFieldsStatusLbl.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; - grdQCFields.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; - - fieldsWorker.RunWorkerAsync(refreshFlag); - this.HideLoader(); - } + private readonly BackgroundWorker fieldsWorker; + + public ALMItemsFieldsConfigurationPage(...) + { + InitializeComponent(); + InitializeBackgroundWorker(); + // ... rest of the constructor + } + + private void InitializeBackgroundWorker() + { + fieldsWorker = new BackgroundWorker + { + WorkerReportsProgress = true + }; + fieldsWorker.DoWork += fieldsWorker_DoWork; + fieldsWorker.ProgressChanged += FieldsWorker_ProgressChanged; + fieldsWorker.RunWorkerCompleted += fieldsWorker_Completed; + } + + public void RunWorker(Boolean refreshFlag) + { + if (fieldsWorker.IsBusy) + { + Reporter.ToUser(eUserMsgKey.StaticInfoMessage, "Please wait for the current operation to complete."); + return; + } + + this.ShowLoader(); + LoadFieldsStatusLbl.Visibility = Visibility.Visible; + grdQCFields.Visibility = Visibility.Collapsed; + fieldsWorker.RunWorkerAsync(refreshFlag); + }
Line range hint
134-134: Address the TODO comment about save function reorganization.The comment indicates a need to preserve old field values during save operations.
Would you like me to help implement the save function reorganization or create a GitHub issue to track this improvement?
Thank you for your contribution.
Before submitting this PR, please make sure:
Summary by CodeRabbit