Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove inactive username_password_not_available test #1647

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

EliahKagan
Copy link
Member

@EliahKagan EliahKagan commented Oct 24, 2024

This is cleanup related to #1644, which further complicated the attributes on the #[ignore]d username_password_not_available test with an empty that was built (but never run) whenever the expectrl tests of gix-prompt were not built. Instead of keeping its attributes more complicated and maintaining an expectation that they continue to be updated along with the target_os support for expectrl's ptyprocess dependency, this removes that empty test.

The purpose of the test case that this removes is unclear, and it may not have value anymore. It is unclear in part because actual interaction to provide a username and password is likely to work on some systems for which the related tests that use expectrl are not being built. But this empty test case might be read to say otherwise.

See also the related discussion at #1644 (review).

This is cleanup related to GitoxideLabs#1644, which further complicated the
attributes on the `#[ignore]`d `username_password_not_available`
test with an empty that was build (but never run) whenever the
`expectrl` tests of `gix-prompt` were not built. Instead of keeping
its attributes more complicated and maintaining an expectation that
they continue to be updated along with the `target_os` support for
`expectrl`'s `ptyprocess` dependency, this removes that empty test.

The purpose of the test case that this removes is unclear, and it
may not have value anymore. It is unclear in part because actual
interaction to provide a username and password is likely to work on
some systems for which the related tests that use `expectrl` are
not being built. But this empty test case might be read to say
otherwise.

See also the related discussion at:
GitoxideLabs#1644 (review)
Copy link
Member

@Byron Byron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you 🙏!

@Byron Byron merged commit b351c27 into GitoxideLabs:main Oct 24, 2024
16 checks passed
@EliahKagan EliahKagan deleted the ptyprocess-targets-next branch October 24, 2024 11:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants