This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 11, 2022. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
Try to find the active gcloud config #348
Closed
ravwojdyla
wants to merge
2
commits into
GoogleCloudPlatform:master
from
ravwojdyla:gcloud_active_config
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do the paths specified in these locations work on windows?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question - there is
if
branch forwindows
before, also previous version of the code assumed the same hierarchy for all platforms (here). What would you suggest?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems as though Google is vending a library that already does this and instead of Dataflow owning this logic, we can rely on this library but wanted to make sure that this meets your needs:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/gcloud-java/blob/master/gcloud-java-core/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/ServiceOptions.java
Look at the logic for defaultProject(), specifically activeGoogleCloudConfig() and googleCloudProjectId()
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry @lukecwik - was on vacation. I see, thanks for the gcloud-java link, I looked at the code, and it's pretty much the same. afaiu current DF does not check for:
Specifically
serviceAccountProjectId
could be interesting, afaiu it would discover if user is using a service account throughGOOGLE_APPLICATION_CREDENTIALS
and then if available, fetch the project from the credentials file. One could argue if that is good or bad idea, probably good fordefaultProject
.It seems like we could push this PR, I could submit PR to gcloud-java to abstract the project discover logic away from
ServiceOptions
, then I could submit another PR to DF to start using gcloud-java? Does it sound like a good plan?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ping @lukecwik
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ping 2x @lukecwik - do you think we should wait for google-cloud-java or move forward?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would wait for google-cloud-java, it seems as though they are working towards the change as evidenced on googleapis/google-cloud-java#1207