Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Raise error if params.yaml contains invalid fields #2049

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

kislaykishore
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Link to the issue in case of a bug fix.

NA

Testing details

  1. Manual - NA
  2. Unit tests - NA
  3. Integration tests - NA

@kislaykishore kislaykishore requested a review from a team as a code owner June 24, 2024 01:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.04%. Comparing base (c81eddf) to head (d32c3c6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2049      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.48%   72.04%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          99       99              
  Lines       10802    10815      +13     
==========================================
+ Hits         7722     7792      +70     
+ Misses       2733     2690      -43     
+ Partials      347      333      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 72.04% <ø> (+0.56%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kislaykishore kislaykishore merged commit b27d3fd into master Jun 24, 2024
13 checks passed
@kislaykishore kislaykishore deleted the reject-remaining-fields branch June 24, 2024 05:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants