Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add status output field to google_cloudfunctions_function to resource and data source. #7913

Merged

Conversation

SarahFrench
Copy link
Contributor

@SarahFrench SarahFrench commented May 10, 2023

This PR adds the status field to google_cloudfunctions_function as a computed output/attribute. The data source is implemented using methods and schemas from the resource, so this change impacts both the resource and data source.

I've updated acceptance tests for the resource and data source to assert the field is there and takes the expected value.

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

cloudfunctions: added `status` attribute to the `google_cloudfunctions_function` resource and data source

@SarahFrench SarahFrench requested a review from megan07 May 10, 2023 18:29
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2725
Passed tests 2439
Skipped tests: 279
Affected tests: 7

Action taken

Found 7 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample|TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation|TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example|TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig[Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example[Debug log]
TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic[Debug log]

Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules[Error message] [Debug log]

Please fix these to complete your PR
View the build log or the debug log for each test

Copy link
Contributor

@megan07 megan07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants