Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed accesscontextmanager spec requirements #7952

Merged

Conversation

alx13
Copy link
Contributor

@alx13 alx13 commented May 16, 2023

Fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14612

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

  • Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
  • Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
  • Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
  • Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
  • Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

accesscontextmanager: Fixed incorrect schema in spec for `google_access_context_manager_service_perimeter`. 

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs.

I've detected that you're a community contributor. @megan07, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes.

❓ First time contributing? Click here for more details

Your assigned reviewer will help review your code by:

  • Ensuring it's backwards compatible, covers common error cases, etc.
  • Summarizing the change into a user-facing changelog note.
  • Passes tests, either our "VCR" suite, a set of presubmit tests, or with manual test runs.

You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails.

If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox.


@modular-magician modular-magician added the awaiting-approval Pull requests that needs reviewer's approval to run presubmit tests label May 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@megan07 megan07 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this looks good, thank you!

out of curiosity, what was the error the user saw prior to this change?

@alx13
Copy link
Contributor Author

alx13 commented May 23, 2023

Basically inability to have empty status blocks, so in bridge perimeters you had to configure one of resources, access_levels or restricted_services to null.

And it was causing a constant drift between [] and null here:

https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-foundation-fabric/blob/master/modules/vpc-sc/service-perimeters-bridge.tf#L38

Reference:
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/blob/main/helper/schema/schema.go#L282

@megan07
Copy link
Contributor

megan07 commented May 23, 2023

Ok. Were you able to test it out and see this fixed it? I'm just curious because these still exist on the status block:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules/pull/7952/files#diff-7a2e1e241b560b7faaa972c7294741d0b40cc943f61d55945cd3c0b1232ef483R155

I'm just wondering if that's correct or if we need to remove those?

@alx13
Copy link
Contributor Author

alx13 commented May 23, 2023

We don't need to remove this. Just check how it's translated in the end:

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/blob/main/google/resource_access_context_manager_service_perimeter.go#L98

https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-google/blob/main/google/resource_access_context_manager_service_perimeter.go#L434

status and spec are marked as optional, but as spec fields are referring to status it's glitching.

According to https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/blob/main/helper/schema/schema.go#L282 :

the syntax is "parent_block_name.0.child_attribute_name".

@megan07
Copy link
Contributor

megan07 commented May 23, 2023

yup, yup! i agree this change is good, i just wanted to make sure it was solving the ultimate issue. thanks!

@modular-magician modular-magician removed the awaiting-approval Pull requests that needs reviewer's approval to run presubmit tests label May 24, 2023
@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2747
Passed tests 2455
Skipped tests: 283
Affected tests: 9

Action taken

Found 9 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig|TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccWorkstationsWorkstationIamPolicyGenerated|TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example|TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation|TestAccWorkstationsWorkstationConfigIamPolicyGenerated|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample

Get to know how VCR tests work

@modular-magician
Copy link
Collaborator

Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig[Debug log]
TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic[Debug log]
TestAccWorkstationsWorkstationIamPolicyGenerated[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccWorkstationsWorkstationConfigIamPolicyGenerated[Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample[Debug log]

Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules[Error message] [Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example[Error message] [Debug log]

Please fix these to complete your PR
View the build log or the debug log for each test

@megan07 megan07 merged commit b314b0e into GoogleCloudPlatform:main May 24, 2023
shourya116 pushed a commit to shourya116/magic-modules that referenced this pull request May 25, 2023
* fixed accesscontextmanager spec requirements

fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14612

* fixed google_access_context_manager_service_perimeter as well
ericayyliu pushed a commit to ericayyliu/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2023
* fixed accesscontextmanager spec requirements

fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14612

* fixed google_access_context_manager_service_perimeter as well
wj-chen pushed a commit to wj-chen/magic-modules that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2023
* fixed accesscontextmanager spec requirements

fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#14612

* fixed google_access_context_manager_service_perimeter as well
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong schema in google_access_context_manager_service_perimeter
3 participants