added excluded_fields and included_fields to data_loss_prevention_job_trigger resource

[JayS-crest]

Added included_fields and excluded_fields to data_loss_prevention_job_trigger with relevent tests
fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#8807
fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#8838

If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:

• Searched through the issue tracker for an open issue that this either resolves or contributes to, commented on it to claim it, and written "fixes {url}" or "part of {url}" in this PR description. If there were no relevant open issues, I opened one and commented that I would like to work on it (not necessary for very small changes).
• Ensured that all new fields I added that can be set by a user appear in at least one example (for generated resources) or third_party test (for handwritten resources or update tests).
• Generated Terraform providers, and ran make test and make lint in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.
• Ran relevant acceptance tests using my own Google Cloud project and credentials (If the acceptance tests do not yet pass or you are unable to run them, please let your reviewer know).
• Read the Release Notes Guide before writing my release note below.

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

dlp: added fields `included_fields` and `excluded_fields` to resource `google_data_loss_prevention_job_trigger`

[modular-magician]

Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs.

I've detected that you're a community contributor. @melinath, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes.

❓ First time contributing? Click here for more details

---

Your assigned reviewer will help review your code by:

• Ensuring it's backwards compatible, covers common error cases, etc.
• Summarizing the change into a user-facing changelog note.
• Passes tests, either our "VCR" suite, a set of presubmit tests, or with manual test runs.

You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails.

If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox.

---

[modular-magician]

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 412 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 412 insertions(+))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))

[modular-magician]

Tests analytics

Total tests: 12
Passed tests 12
Skipped tests: 0
Affected tests: 0

Errors occurred during REPLAYING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR
View the build log

[melinath]

some of the helper functions used in handwritten test files were recently moved to a separate package & made exportable - it looks like you're still using the old names, which is causing the tests to not compile. Please fix that :-)

[JayS-crest]

some of the helper functions used in handwritten test files were recently moved to a separate package & made exportable - it looks like you're still using the old names, which is causing the tests to not compile. Please fix that :-)

I have changed that for the test functions, should work now, thanks.

[modular-magician]

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 412 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 3 files changed, 412 insertions(+))
TF Conversion: Diff ( 3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-))

[modular-magician]

Tests analytics

Total tests: 2753
Passed tests 2459
Skipped tests: 283
Affected tests: 11

Action taken

Found 11 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests

TestAccBillingSubaccount_basic|TestAccBillingSubaccount_renameOnDestroy|TestAccDataLossPreventionJobTrigger_dlpJobTriggerUpdateExample4|TestAccDataLossPreventionJobTrigger_dlpJobTriggerUpdateExample3|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample|TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation|TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation|TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example|TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig|TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic

Get to know how VCR tests work

[modular-magician]

Tests passed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccDataLossPreventionJobTrigger_dlpJobTriggerUpdateExample4[Debug log]
TestAccDataLossPreventionJobTrigger_dlpJobTriggerUpdateExample3[Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFile_apigeeKeystoresAliasesKeyCertFileTestExample[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbCluster_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccAlloydbBackup_missingLocation[Debug log]
TestAccApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12_ApigeeKeystoresAliasesPkcs12Example[Debug log]
TestAccDataSourceGoogleFirebaseAndroidAppConfig[Debug log]
TestAccDataSourceAlloydbLocations_basic[Debug log]

Tests failed during RECORDING mode:
TestAccBillingSubaccount_basic[Error message] [Debug log]
TestAccBillingSubaccount_renameOnDestroy[Error message] [Debug log]
TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules[Error message] [Debug log]

Please fix these to complete your PR
View the build log or the debug log for each test

[melinath]

LGTM. In general it would be preferred to combine all update tests into a single (longer) case rather than having one test per field, but since these seem to run quickly and there isn't a clear single update test already, not blocking on it.

That said, it would be great to consider doing a separate PR to combine these update tests & reduce boilerplate.

[melinath]

VCR failures are unrelated.

[JayS-crest]

LGTM. In general it would be preferred to combine all update tests into a single (longer) case rather than having one test per field, but since these seem to run quickly and there isn't a clear single update test already, not blocking on it.

That said, it would be great to consider doing a separate PR to combine these update tests & reduce boilerplate.

Got it, I'll do a seperate PR in order to combine the tests.