-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for creating Apigee Organization without VPC peering #8317
Add support for creating Apigee Organization without VPC peering #8317
Conversation
Hello! I am a robot who works on Magic Modules PRs. I've detected that you're a community contributor. @ScottSuarez, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to assist you and help review your changes. ❓ First time contributing? Click here for more detailsYour assigned reviewer will help review your code by:
You can help make sure that review is quick by running local tests and ensuring they're passing in between each push you make to your PR's branch. Also, try to leave a comment with each push you make, as pushes generally don't generate emails. If your reviewer doesn't get back to you within a week after your most recent change, please feel free to leave a comment on the issue asking them to take a look! In the absence of a dedicated review dashboard most maintainers manage their pending reviews through email, and those will sometimes get lost in their inbox. |
Unit tests are failing in my environment, even without any changes. However, the acceptance test for my changes are running successfully. Is it some known issue? Any help to resolve the failures would be appreciated. Thanks. https://gist.github.com/baskaran-md/5c1815980162e01a8a162741025aefc4 |
Ah, looks like this is an issue on our end! Seems we are not unsetting the env variables in our unit tests. I'll put out a patch soon. Don't worry about the unit tests locally for now. As long as our CI for them is green. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)) |
Acceptance Test for GA:
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules |
|
907fe68
to
aef1f71
Compare
Acceptance Test for BETA: Known issue: hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#13274
|
We can add a diff DiffSuppressFunc for name field so that the api assigned values would be tolerated. Would you willing to try and make these change? It would be a DiffSuppressFunc and a accompanying unit test on the name field. |
Ah never mind, apologies, this fix would be pretty complex to do since the api is reordering them, not revaluing them. |
Could you try adding |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)) |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 6 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccServiceAccountIamPolicy|TestAccVertexAIIndex_updated|TestAccVertexAIIndex_vertexAiIndexStreamingExample|TestAccVertexAIIndex_vertexAiIndexExample|TestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules |
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
77d0cf9
to
9390f3b
Compare
Thank you @ScottSuarez for the pointer. Adding Changes made to test:
|
Ah, well thanks for checking !! We can still get this through considering it's a known issue with other tests. |
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are. Terraform GA: Diff ( 3 files changed, 155 insertions(+)) |
@ScottSuarez Thanks for reviewing. Is there anything needed from my side? If not, when can we expect this to be merged & roll out to production? Any ETA would be great to communicate internally & externally with customers. |
Tests analyticsTotal tests: Action takenFound 8 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected testsTestAccContainerAwsNodePool_BetaBasicHandWritten|TestAccComputeFirewallPolicyRule_multipleRules|TestAccClouddeployDeliveryPipeline_VerifyDeliveryPipeline|TestAccClouddeployDeliveryPipeline_DeliveryPipeline|TestAccClouddeployDeliveryPipeline_CanaryDeliveryPipeline|TestAccClouddeployDeliveryPipeline_CanaryServiceNetworkingDeliveryPipeline|TestAccClouddeployDeliveryPipeline_CanaryrunDeliveryPipeline|TestAccClouddeployTarget_Target |
Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues
|
Merging now. You can expect it to be rolled out to production in about 1.5w. Likely the 24th release pending no issue. |
This pull request fixes hashicorp/terraform-provider-google#15135
If this PR is for Terraform, I acknowledge that I have:
make test
andmake lint
in the generated providers to ensure it passes unit and linter tests.make test
is failing due to known issue. Please check below comment for more info.Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)