Set labels and annotations fields in cloudrunv2 data sources

[zli82016]

Release Note Template for Downstream PRs (will be copied)

cloudrunv2: set fields `labels` and `terraform_labels` having all of labels present on the resource in GCP in data source `google_cloud_run_v2_service`

cloudrunv2: set field `annotations` having all of annotations present on the resource in GCP in data source `google_cloud_run_v2_service`

cloudrunv2: set fields `labels` and `terraform_labels` having all of labels present on the resource in GCP in data source `google_cloud_run_v2_job`

cloudrunv2: set field `annotations` having all of annotations present on the resource in GCP in data source `google_cloud_run_v2_job`

[modular-magician]

Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes:

Diff report

Your PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.

Terraform GA: Diff ( 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+))
Terraform Beta: Diff ( 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+))

[modular-magician]

Tests analytics

Total tests: 3153
Passed tests 2833
Skipped tests: 318
Affected tests: 2

Action taken

Found 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests

TestAccDataSourceGoogleCloudRunV2Service_basic|TestAccDataSourceGoogleCloudRunV2Job_basic

Get to know how VCR tests work

[modular-magician]

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{Tests passed during RECORDING mode:}}$
TestAccDataSourceGoogleCloudRunV2Service_basic[Debug log]
TestAccDataSourceGoogleCloudRunV2Job_basic[Debug log]

Rerun these tests in REPLAYING mode to catch issues

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun.}}$

---

$\textcolor{green}{\textsf{All tests passed!}}$
View the build log or the debug log for each test

[zli82016]

Is it a breaking change to change the value of fields for data source?

[rileykarson]

These are reasonably bugfixes given the new model on the resource and the model applied to other datasources- this was just an unintentional regression.

Other kinds of changes- such as changing the format of a field- would be though.