[doc] fix profile activation sample

[mblottiere]

Description
This fixes a missing "-" in the profile config sample where multiple triggers are demonstrated.

User facing changes (remove if N/A)
This only impacts documentation.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5222 (48a4555) into master (95092ad) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #5222   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.84%   71.84%           
=======================================
  Files         387      387           
  Lines       13974    13974           
=======================================
  Hits        10040    10040           
  Misses       3195     3195           
  Partials      739      739           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 95092ad...48a4555. Read the comment docs.

[briandealwis]

Thanks!

[ml-]

@mblottiere Hi, please excuse the late message in this already merged PR.

Looking at the doc where this sample is included, it looks to me like it was correct before.

https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/skaffold/blob/master/docs/content/en/docs/environment/profiles.md

In the example below:

 * `profile1` is activated if `MAGIC_VAR` is 42
 * `profile2` is activated if `MAGIC_VAR` is 1337 or we are running `skaffold dev` while kubecontext is set to `minikube`.

{{% readfile file="samples/profiles/activations.yaml" %}}

What I see here is:

if MAGIC_VAR == 1337 or (command == "dev" and kubeContext == "minikube"):
  profile2

Is this simply a misunderstanding or could you kindly point out where I made the mistake?

[mblottiere]

@ml- you are completely right 😱 this PR indeed introduced a mismatch between documentation and example.
Revert PR incoming.