Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cosmos-sdk v0.45.8 #21

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 13, 2022
Merged

Conversation

faddat
Copy link
Contributor

@faddat faddat commented Aug 25, 2022

Description

Hi :D

Just a PR here that brings the liquidity module current with cosmos-sdk v0.45.8


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 25, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #21 (b3b4288) into release/v1.5.1 (76ae711) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 71.42%.

@@                Coverage Diff                 @@
##           release/v1.5.1      #21      +/-   ##
==================================================
+ Coverage           33.24%   33.26%   +0.02%     
==================================================
  Files                  44       44              
  Lines               12503    12507       +4     
==================================================
+ Hits                 4156     4160       +4     
  Misses               7855     7855              
  Partials              492      492              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
app/export.go 13.18% <ø> (ø)
app/test_helpers.go 0.66% <0.00%> (ø)
x/liquidity/types/msgs.go 100.00% <ø> (ø)
x/liquidity/types/querier.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/liquidity/simulation/operations.go 80.08% <100.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
x/liquidity/types/liquidity_pool.go 97.89% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@faddat faddat changed the title cosmos-sdk v0.45.7 cosmos-sdk v0.45.8 Aug 25, 2022
Copy link
Collaborator

@jaybxyz jaybxyz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM other than the failing lint check.

@jaybxyz
Copy link
Collaborator

jaybxyz commented Sep 5, 2022

Hey @faddat, we're planning to merge this PR sometime this week. It seems like to me that this PR doesn't have permission granted for maintainer(s) to directly commit changes. So I am asking you to make the following changes when you have time. As I test to fix the lint issue locally, I found the following issues that can be resolved.

  • Remove the linter deadcode in golangci.yml as it is deprecated and replaced by unused.
  • Fix // nolint:revive to //nolint:revive (no space in between)

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor Author

faddat commented Sep 10, 2022

totally!

Thanks for checking thorough this.

@faddat
Copy link
Contributor Author

faddat commented Sep 10, 2022

Random question:

When I make PR's from notional-labs repos, people cannot update them as you describe. When I make them as me, they can.

Do you have any idea how we can fix that?

@jaybxyz
Copy link
Collaborator

jaybxyz commented Sep 12, 2022

Did you allow "Allow edits from maintainers" check box when you open this PR? If you do, then owners of a project can directly push their commits to your PR.

@jaybxyz jaybxyz merged commit 95017fa into Gravity-Devs:release/v1.5.1 Sep 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants