-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: compaction integration #997
feat: compaction integration #997
Conversation
aaa221f
to
10d9377
Compare
10d9377
to
c04f2d4
Compare
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #997 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 86.24% 85.95% -0.30%
===========================================
Files 432 433 +1
Lines 62494 62663 +169
===========================================
- Hits 53897 53861 -36
- Misses 8597 8802 +205
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
e24605c
to
c9fdf4a
Compare
c9fdf4a
to
00685df
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
L6TM
* feat: trigger compaction on flush * chore: rebase develop * feat: add config item max_file_in_level0 and remove compaction_after_flush * fix: cr comments * chore: add unit test to cover Timestamp::new_inclusive * fix: workaround to fix future is not Sync * fix: future is not sync * fix: some cr comments
I hereby agree to the terms of the GreptimeDB CLA
AccessLayer
trait to accept an enum of data source so it can now accept both rows from memtable or chunk reader.Checklist
Refer to a related PR or issue link (optional)
#930