Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches #1572
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This reverts commit d1bd21a. ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This pr aims to revert SPARK-45502 to make the test case `KafkaSourceStressSuite` stable. ### Why are the changes needed? The test case `KafkaSourceStressSuite` has become very unstable after the merger of SPARK-45502, with 10 out of the recent 22 tests failing because of it. Revert it for now, and we can upgrade Kafka again after resolving the test issues. - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6497999347/job/17648385705 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6502219014/job/17660900989 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6502591917/job/17661861797 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6503144598/job/17663199041 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6503233514/job/17663413817 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6504416528/job/17666334238 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6509796846/job/17682130466 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6510877112/job/17685502094 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6512948316/job/17691625228 - https://github.com/apache/spark/actions/runs/6516366232/job/17699813649 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Pass GitHub Actions ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes #43379 from LuciferYang/Revert-SPARK-45502. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This pr aims to upgrade jetty from 9.4.52.v20230823 to 9.4.53.v20231009 ### Why are the changes needed? This version fix 2 CVE: - [CVE-2023-36478](GHSA-wgh7-54f2-x98r) | https://github.com/apache/spark/security/dependabot/77 - [CVE-2023-44487](GHSA-qppj-fm5r-hxr3) the full release notes as follows: - https://github.com/jetty/jetty.project/releases/tag/jetty-9.4.53.v20231009 ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? - Pass GitHub Actions ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes #43375 from LuciferYang/SPARK-45540. Lead-authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Co-authored-by: YangJie <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
…ONNECTION_TIMEOUT` ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? This pr just add `Deprecated` for `SparkLauncher#DEPRECATED_CHILD_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT`. ### Why are the changes needed? From the javadoc, `DEPRECATED_CHILD_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT` has been deprecated, so it should carry a `Deprecated` marker. ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? Pass GitHub Actions ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? No Closes #43374 from LuciferYang/DEPRECATED_CHILD_CONNECTION_TIMEOUT-Deprecated. Authored-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com> Signed-off-by: yangjie01 <yangjie01@baidu.com>
…error framework parameters ### What changes were proposed in this pull request? - Expand more exception constructors to support error framework parameters ### Why are the changes needed? - Better integration with the error framework ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change? No ### How was this patch tested? `build/sbt "connect-client-jvm/testOnly *SparkConnectClientSuite"` ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling? Closes #43368 from heyihong/SPARK-45517. Authored-by: Yihong He <yihong.he@databricks.com> Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
GulajavaMinistudio
merged commit 47a0ddf
into
GulajavaMinistudio:master
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Why are the changes needed?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
How was this patch tested?
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?