Sharing Protocol Transport Abstraction & Modularity #520
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Current coverage is 48.54% (diff: 41.66%)@@ master #520 diff @@
==========================================
Files 55 55
Lines 6579 6586 +7
Methods 0 0
Messages 0 0
Branches 1379 1382 +3
==========================================
+ Hits 3188 3197 +9
+ Misses 2993 2989 -4
- Partials 398 400 +2
|
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Added all changes from #517 pull request. Please refer to it for more info.
This aims at abstracting the "transport" protocol from the "sharing" protocol and easily be able to extend the sharing protocol to support more transport protocols (i2p, ip6, etc.). But for now it only serves the purpose of simulating libzeronet benchmarking because libzeronet doesn't support non-zeronet trackers or ip4.