Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address missing task data #2274

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 18, 2022
Merged

Address missing task data #2274

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 18, 2022

Conversation

ssalinas
Copy link
Member

We are seeing some NPEs come through here. Adding more logging to see what is missing on the task definition here

Copy link
Contributor

@WH77 WH77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

@ssalinas ssalinas changed the title Extra logging for nulls in LB client Address missing task data Mar 17, 2022
@ssalinas
Copy link
Member Author

update here, found some additional pieces. Based on the logs and the fact that a regular task bounce (which uses getTask vs getTasks) succeeds. We can say the task data is in the zkCache, but not in zk itself. So, as a bandaid, this attempts to repair the task if we see that case, before continuing on to the methods that would throw exceptions. The overall flow should remain the same if the task is still not present

Copy link
Contributor

@WH77 WH77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

Copy link
Contributor

@WH77 WH77 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚢

@ssalinas ssalinas merged commit 74279ca into master Mar 18, 2022
@ssalinas ssalinas deleted the extra_logging_lb branch March 18, 2022 13:14
@ssalinas ssalinas added this to the 1.5.0 milestone May 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants