Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(gzip): switch to klauspost/compress gzip #2600

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023
Merged

feat(gzip): switch to klauspost/compress gzip #2600

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

dnwe
Copy link
Collaborator

@dnwe dnwe commented Aug 16, 2023

As suggested in #2359, use klauspost/compress for our gzip implementation as we're already using the module for other compression algorithms and benchmarks show 1.5x-7x improvement

As suggested in #2359, use klauspost/compress for our gzip
implementation as we're already using the module for other compression
algorithms and benchmarks show 1.5x-7x improvement

Signed-off-by: Dominic Evans <dominic.evans@uk.ibm.com>
@dnwe dnwe added the feat label Aug 16, 2023
@dnwe dnwe merged commit d2dba29 into main Aug 16, 2023
12 checks passed
@dnwe dnwe deleted the dnwe/gzip branch August 16, 2023 23:07
@klauspost
Copy link
Contributor

@dnwe If possible you shouldn't do testing against compressed output. There is sure to be changes to the output - which would mean an upgrade would break your tests again.

@dnwe
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dnwe commented Aug 17, 2023

@klauspost yes I'm not really sure what the intention of that unittest was tbh, but for now I just kept it compatible

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants